Ok. Who has it. What are your thoughts. Is this the game I should order
and prepare to spend my holiday break trying to grind through it over
and over? :P
Ok. Who has it. What are your thoughts. Is this the game I should order andprepare to spend my holiday break trying to grind through it over and over? :P
I've read its laughably buggy and if you're on console not to get it?
The console versions are so messed up that appearently the studio prevented all reviewers from reviewing the console version.
(For the record, Darkness 2 does contains references to the original Cyberpunk PNP RPG that 2077 is based on!)
The buzz seems to be pretty positive on console, even with all of the (hilarious, at times) bugs. I haven't read much about the PC version. The
Personally, I plan on waiting until then. Beyond that, it looks like something I'd really, really enjoy. I've only played a bit of the first Witcher and watched my SO play through a lot of Witcher 3, but my impressionsare quite positive.
You must have put that their for me as I was about to ask, lol.
I saw one video that made it look REAL bad, but then I went to YouTube quick and watched some base PS4 gameplay and it didn't look as bad.
What the video was exploiting was clearly some sort of bug and they made it seem like the entire game was that way.
After that I ended up watching IGN and Digital Foundry breakdown of the games, and they said its not worth playing on the base consoles but if
you have a SX or PS5 its servicable in backwards compatible mode. The
SX running in quality mode looks the best and runs at 30fps and the PS5 version performance mode runs the best at 60fps.
The XBox base version was dropping down to *10 fps at sub 720p
resolution* and that is pretty unplayable if you ask me.
They did mention that Witcher 3 was pretty rough at release on consoles and that they vastly improved it over time. I just wonder how much time they're going to spend trying to do that when the next gen consoles are already out.
Sounds like the smart thing to do and I am right there with you. I'm going to wait for a PS5 version which will have a ton of fixes by then too. This game theme is right up my alley and I know it is yours too,
so I can wait a few more months for a superior experience. I'd rather
not have some technical issues and a lifeless world that takes away from it.
They specifically said that the console version lacks immersion because they've scaled back so much on the population and traffic density. They kind of stressed that its a big deal too. I want that immersion, so
yeah I'm going to hold off for performance improvements and native next-gen.
Blech. To clarify, I was referring to the wacky bugs that people have beenposting about nonstop since the game launched, NOT performance. I
DLCs. So,it may not be tomorrow or anything, but eventually Cyberpunk
2077 should endup in a much better state. I'm guessing the Series X|S
and PS5 will get nextgen versions or patches that'll improve performance on those systems, butthose with last gen base consoles are probably
hosed. :/
I would consider myself what has been deemed a "patient gamer" anyway, whichis to say I rarely spring on stuff on release day, and I play a lot of olderstuff, so while missing out on the release hype and conversation is a bummer,getting a better game (sometimes with bundled DLC) for a cheaper price, at atime when I know I'll have the time to dive into it, definitely isn't. :)
Oh yeah I knew that, I just stumbled down that performance path as we
were talking about things so I thought I'd pass it along.
Normally the gaming community has massive meltdowns about things that aren't even real or massively exaggerated, but this time it seems there are actual legit reasons for people to be upset.
I do think its par for the course that "crossover generation" games run not-so-great on the last generation hardware though. Last generation
had some AAA games like GTA5 that didn't run so well on PS3 but were
great on PS4. This will be one of those games.
Digital Foundry also said they have a 3090 RTX system running it sub 60 frames so its capable of defeating any hardware you throw at it if you keep moving up the settings. Getting something like that to run on 7
year old systems that were already "underpowered" in 2013 must be nearly impossible.
I think I am one of those too except for a few small situations. I
bought Final Fantasy VII Remake on day 1 because I had that nostalgia
from playing it when I was a teenager. Other than that, the last game I can remember anticipating on release day was Mass Effect Andromeda. I just googled and that was early 2017!
Are there any upcoming games you're really interested in? I've been out of the loop lately so there isn't anything on my radar at the moment,
but I am looking forward to checking out No Man's Sky a bit more during
my vacation (I usually take the last week of December off).
Ha! There are soooooo many references to other cyberpunk, sci-fi, and misc. works in that game, though most are fairly subtle. :)
Dune II is awesome for its age. Beware the interface is tricky until you get it right.
Command and Conquer, its spiritual sucessor, is the peak of DOS RTS. It features actually differentiated armies, units with strengths and weaknesses etc all. And their interface was much improved.
Warcraft 1 just coudln't compare (and I still like that game). Warcraft
2 came close because they improved the interface quite a lot, the fantasytheme and atmopsphere were well built, and there was actual naval combat. Naval combat in other RTS that came after always felt a bit underwhelming to me. I think I missed the submarines and the awesome soundblast from the cannons,. --
Command and Conquer, its spiritual sucessor, is the peak of DOS RTS. It features actually differentiated armies, units with strengths and weaknessesetc all. And their interface was much improved.
Yeah, I love the Warcraft, but a part of Blizzard's winning formula has always been (well, I guess starting with Warcraft 1) dumbing down the experience other games introduced to make it a little more accessible, and supplementing that with great aesthetics. I plan on playing through those again one of these days soon as well. Man, I'm going to have to have some kind of insane RTS extravaganza by the looks of it. :)
I don't consider myself a Blizzard guru or anything, so I don't know
which games they have made which are dumbed down versions of others. Can you share? I am curious! I guess Command and Conquer -> Warcraft 1 could count, but Warcraft 1 really feels more like its own thing.
I liked Diablo 1. It felt like a dumbed down Rogue played in real time
and without permadeath. Maybe it counts as a dumbed down Moria?
Oh yeah I knew that, I just stumbled down that performance path as we were talking about things so I thought I'd pass it along.
Hey bud, can you shoot me an email, nandre -at- net229 -dot- org.
Had some questions for you...
Hey bud, can you shoot me an email, nandre -at- net229 -dot- org.
Had some questions for you...
You looking for a feature to be added into the Mystic "Now with more Cow Bell" release?
But that wasn't my question. Its fancy developer super hacker stuff you wouldn't understand, but are happy to blindly trust and install when he releases his new Sharks With Freakin' Lasers Edition.
But that wasn't my question. Its fancy developer super hacker stuff you wouldn't understand, but are happy to blindly trust and install when he releases his new Sharks With Freakin' Lasers Edition.
Yes, you can use ? inplace of the PRINT statement in Commodore BASIC. That should answer your question.
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 66 |
Nodes: | 4 (1 / 3) |
Uptime: | 02:09:57 |
Calls: | 612 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 7,638 |
Messages: | 292,635 |