i am curious if anyone uses this os on their old systems
i really hate the 386 only software like the bloody defragger and yeah
the command.com uses a bunch of ram i stuck with 4dos which i think
might use less ram
i am curious if anyone uses this os on their old systems
needing a 386 to work & was just taking up space. 3 - I have no idea
why, but I just could not get anything that provided network drives
to work. I tried XFS, Lantastic the novell netware client for DOS
& none of them could successfully mount network drives when running
in Freedos.
i am curious if anyone uses this os on their old systems
I know! The defragger of all things! How rude!
That's a negative. Actually never seen it.
I am using FreeDOS on two systems.
A 1995 desktop with a Pentium processor and 32 MB memory.
A 2005 laptop with a Pentium-M processor and 512 MB memory.
They are both networked through a serial port and sneakernet.
I use FreeDOS because i like that it comes with source code.SAME! <3 <3 <3 <3
They are both networked through a serial port and sneakernet.
eh u can us2e serial port for networking!? how?
They are both networked through a serial port and sneakernet.
eh u can us2e serial port for networking!? how?
I normally use kermit. In the 90's i used dosppp.
i am curious if anyone uses this os on their old systems
Re: anyone uses FreeDOS?
By: mary4 to All on Fri Jun 28 2024 11:08:05
I am using FreeDOS on two systems.
A 1995 desktop with a Pentium processor and 32 MB memory.
A 2005 laptop with a Pentium-M processor and 512 MB memory.
They are both networked through a serial port and sneakernet.
I use FreeDOS because i like that it comes with source code.
i am curious if anyone uses this os on their old systemsI just installed it on my HP t510.
i am curious if anyone uses this os on their old systemsI just installed it on my HP t510.
I have it on my old iMac2011. It worked fine but I haven't used it on daily basis for a long time.. like 5 years or so.. But when I did, I
liked to call it HackinDOS ;)
MSDOS documentation is gone
now days, but I found enough online with an OK example to get my system online.
With the concept of Shadow Libraries plus AO's books there is a lot ofI've never heard of Shadow Libraries, or AO's books. Are AD's books meaning 1980's books?
forgotten knowledge available again and because those were once
commercially published books, quality and structure is very well thought
out usually.
I relearned TASM's IDEAL mode thanks to one of those books.
If you have any specific question, shoot, maybe I have found the answer already. I've been playing with DOS on almost daily basis for 3-4 years already. Staying loyal to 6.22 as my basis.
With the concept of Shadow Libraries plus AO's books there is a lot oI've never heard of Shadow Libraries, or AO's books. Are AD's books meaning 1980's books?
What an awesome resource!With the concept of Shadow Libraries plus AO's books there is aI've never heard of Shadow Libraries, or AO's books. Are AD's books meaning 1980's books?
Re: Shadow Libraries
https://greycoder.com/a-list-of-the-largest-shadow-libraries/
Best equipped today is Anna's Archive. I liked Z-Library before but now
it's full of scam.
AO => Archive Online (www.archive.org) of course.
If you search both, you can find a lot of interesting books for free (of course legality of such download can be discussed on per country's local laws/interpretations.
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 66 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 09:50:51 |
Calls: | 728 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 7,666 |
Messages: | 295,336 |