You know the funny thing... the seller also had an Atari 400,
working, that they would have let go for almost any OK offer.
Yeah, I'll be honest, the 400 isn't one of the machines I'm looking for
in my collection. I also passed (so far) on a 600xl (might be reconsidering that someday though due to the size) and the 65xe.
If you're only going to get one, the 800xl is really the way to go. A 1200xl is pretty great, but the keyboards tend to be faulty (but also not to hard to repair, and beyond that, it's the best keyboard out there).
And again, I've never been an Atari guy - but I thought the ST line
was the shining star, or what one would want to try to get... same w/
that IIe, tho; there are many machines 'better' - but the IIe is a
gem even tho much less capable that the IIgs/Mac/etc, because of how popular and successful it was.. if I ever find that gem Atari I might
go... 800, ST.
And again, I've never been an Atari guy - but I thought the ST line
was the shining star, or what one would want to try to get... same w/
that IIe, tho; there are many machines 'better' - but the IIe is a
gem even tho much less capable that the IIgs/Mac/etc, because of how popular and successful it was.. if I ever find that gem Atari I might
go... 800, ST.
I've always seen the Atari 8bit and Amiga as a natural progression
of systems- and the company Atari - esp after Tramiel bought it and brought out the ST- and something that had nothing to do with the
classic 8bit line of computers.
I really wish I'd of known of Amiga [and Atari] in the 90s... I was a PC-DOS kid, but IMO Amiga was the better platform!!! Wow; bold
statement, eh??
ATARI....? yeah.. the consoles were great but only if you liked the 70s aesthetics in the 80s... Atari was dead in the 90s.. big time! OS that looks like GeOS poor brother.. no extra chipsets.. all relying on weak
CPU to handle everything... and that design that looks like if somebody scooped some metal buttons on top of cheap plastic and the ass was put diagonal on the box, so the buttons are skewed....
Darklord wrote to hollowone <=-
It's interesting to me to watch criticims of some retro computer platforms. To be honest, you have to approach it with the idea of, "but what did it mean then?". Trying to view it through a modern lens is
mostly pointless, IMHO.
Let me give an example. I got my first Atari 520ST in like late 1985, early 1986 (don't remember exactly). I got the SC1224 color monitor,
3.5" floppy drive, 520ST, and some software thrown in for under a
$1000. When the Amiga came out just a few months later, it was $1500
just for the base unit alone. Mac? PC? Forget it - I would have had to
rob a bank or something similar to be able to afford one, and then,
they were *way* underpowered compared to the Amiga and Atari at that
time.
So sure...PC's eventually caught up and bypassed both machines. It took
a while though and I still *loathe* Windows to this day. I use Kubuntu Linux primarily, with one Win10 box for a few games that underperform
with Wine.
Bear in mind that Tramiel and Atari managed to design and release for sale, a modern computer within a -6- month time period. Has that ever
been done before or since? Something to think about.
As far as looks. I've not seen one PC ever that could rival the looks
of my Atari Mega ST, Mega STe or STacy. I'd state the same thing about
the original Amiga A1000 - I think it's a beautiful machine.
I'd still rather fire up one of my Atari's than sit and look at a
Windows box. No heart...no spirit...no soul. Microsoft made sure of
that. :)
--- RATSoft/FIDO v09.14.95 [JetMail 1.01]
* Origin: STar Fleet HQ - Real Atari! bbs.sfhqbbs.org:5983
(21:3/171.0)
So sure...PC's eventually caught up and bypassed both machines. It took a while though and I still *loathe* Windows to this day. I use Kubuntu Linux
yea i personally like the old computer asthetic, "modern" stuff feels too flat and lifeless
i still like windows 7 aero tho
I feel that way about operating systems these days. They've all pretty much gone to a flat look, which I don't think looks as good as the more 3D appearance they used to all have. I don't really understand the trend either, as it looks like something from the late 80s..
Nightfox wrote to candycane <=-
Re: Re: Atari 400; meh.
By: candycane to Darklord on Thu Jul 27 2023 04:11 pm
yea i personally like the old computer asthetic, "modern" stuff feels too flat and lifeless
i still like windows 7 aero tho
I feel that way about operating systems these days. They've all pretty much gone to a flat look, which I don't think looks as good as the more
3D appearance they used to all have. I don't really understand the
trend either, as it looks like something from the late 80s..
Nightfox
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: Digital Distortion: digdist.synchro.net (21:1/137)
Nightfox wrote to Darklord <=-
Re: Re: Atari 400; meh.
By: Darklord to hollowone on Thu Jul 27 2023 01:10 pm
So sure...PC's eventually caught up and bypassed both machines. It took a while though and I still *loathe* Windows to this day. I use Kubuntu Linux
I've always been mainly a PC (DOS/Windows user), but I often didn't
like Microsoft and both liked and disliked Windows.. I started using Windows with version 3.0, and when I got my own computer, it often
seemed like Windows was too much of a resource hog. I thought it was
odd that Windows was what was popular, when arguably better alternatves were available, even for the PC (such as OS/2).
Windows is my main OS at home though, since most of the software I use runs in it. I dual-boot with Linux Mint though.
Nightfox
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: Digital Distortion: digdist.synchro.net (21:1/137)
Windows is my main OS at home though, since most of the software I use runs in it. I dual-boot with Linux Mint though.
yea! tho i personally customized my desktop a bit cuz linux
(how are you supposed to attach images on bbs?)
Throw the image up on imgur or something and drop a link :)
esc wrote to Nightfox <=-
Windows is my main OS at home though, since most of the software I use runs in it. I dual-boot with Linux Mint though.
I maintain one machine at home with Windows 10, but it's strictly for gaming. And honestly I use it the least out of all my computers lol.
After leaving my job a month ago, I had to give back my MacBook, so
I've been using my PC laptop with linux and it's great. I do miss the MacBook and would love to get another, but as I'm currently jobless, I can't justify the expense
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/02/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: m O N T E R E Y b B S . c O M (21:4/173)
Darklord wrote to hollowone <=-
I'd still rather fire up one of my Atari's than sit and look at a
Windows box. No heart...no spirit...no soul. Microsoft made sure of
that. :)
I hate it. The flat interfaces and the massive oversimplification of the GUIs are doing my head in.
Just being able to run an app on my Mac where the developer hasn't paid Apple for a certificate is painful and don't even get me started on Windows 11.
If it weren't for a few apps I use daily that only run on Windows and Mac I would have probably given Linux on the desktop another try (something I haven't done in 20 years).
yea! tho i personally customized my desktop a bit cuz linux (how are you supposed to attach images on bbs?)
i was introduced to linux thru raspberry pi and i was so fascinated by it
I'm Windows 10 on bare metal here, unfortunately, using Windows pays my bills. I do have a work laptop, I could theoretically run Linux on my desktop and use Windows on my work system.
Interesting.. My dad had tried some early versions of Linux in the mid 90s on a PC (using Slackware). I'd used Linux off and on since then, mainly for work, and now I use Linux at home on my BBS PC (which is also my home media server). I dual-boot Windows and Linux on my main PC at
home as well.
i use enlightenment 16 with the Warp theme from here: https://ps.ucw.cz/e16/e16-themes-gallery/
makes for something like a bizzaro world version of the motif window manager that looks like os/2 but with transparency and other goodies
Mac developers now need to pay Apple for a certificate for their software to run on Mac OS? That seems overly draconian.. We have a couple of Macs
A really lightweight image hoster is: https://envs.sh/
No accounts or auth and you can uload with a curl statment. Very
fast and very easy for things like irc and a BBS.
-andy
---
* Origin: Massive BBS | bbs.diller.org (21:3/178)
So this is not 100% correct.
I'm a MAC user, on current MAC hardware and I run quite a few tools that are opensource and come from developers who do not have an apple certificate. (Syncterm is an example :)
Using that SyncTERM example the first time I run a new binary I need to go to Settings -> Privacy & Security, click "Open Anyway" and then authenticate because it hasn't been signed by an Apple Developer ID (which does require payment). Example screenshots:
https://files.ewing.au/?r=1819&k=5b2f34a1e0 https://files.ewing.au/?r=1820&k=cdb91ee4df https://files.ewing.au/?r=1821&k=67a85ad184
Mac developers now need to pay Apple for a certificate for their
software to run on Mac OS? That seems overly draconian..
I think you can also disable that setting so it'll install anything from anywhere, but it's been a while since I've OSX'd in anger.
candycane wrote to fusion <=-
wow, that looks beautiful! i currently just use openbox but i might
switch over to enlightenment for a bit
I think you can also disable that setting so it'll install anything from
anywhere, but it's been a while since I've OSX'd in anger.
making it easier to install non-official apps? that doesnt sound like apple
IMO, a computer is a tool to do work, and I don't think the OS should get in the way of running a program that you want or need to use.
I've always been mainly a PC (DOS/Windows user), but I often didn't lik Microsoft and both liked and disliked Windows.. I started using Window version 3.0, and when I got my own computer, it often seemed like Windo
too much of a resource hog. I thought it was odd that Windows was what popular, when arguably better alternatves were available, even for the (such as OS/2).
After leaving my job a month ago, I had to give back my MacBook, so I'v using my PC laptop with linux and it's great. I do miss the MacBook and love to get another, but as I'm currently jobless, I can't justify the expense :P
Yes, it is a tool that you should be able to run what you want on. TheIMO, a computer is a tool to do work, and I don't think the OS sho
in the way of running a program that you want or need to use.
Re: Re: Atari 400; meh.
By: esc to candycane on Thu Jul 27 2023 09:40 pm
Throw the image up on imgur or something and drop a link :)
right, well heres my desktop (i drew most of it)
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1096798436461903892/113438269 3359034368/desk.png?width=832&height=467
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
I run Windows daily. It is what it is. Do I like it? Meh. Would I prefer to run some form of Linux or move to a Mac? Yes. But the tools I use and
Hello candycane,
28 Jul 23 03:13, you wrote to esc:
Re: Re: Atari 400; meh.
By: esc to candycane on Thu Jul 27 2023 09:40 pm
Throw the image up on imgur or something and drop a link :)
right, well heres my desktop (i drew most of it)
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1096798436461903892/113438269
3359034368/desk.png?width=832&height=467
lol! so many layers :)
Regards,
--
dp
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
... Uptime: 0d 0h 24m 51s
--- GoldED/2 1.1.4.7+EMX
* Origin: Roon's BBS - Budapest, HUNGARY (21:4/148)
It's interesting to me to watch criticims of some retro computer platforms. To be honest, you have to approach it with the idea of, "but what did it mean then?". Trying to view it through a modern lens is
mostly pointless, IMHO.
I think Apple/Mac is about as bad as Microsoft in some ways, and currenYou are right on so many levels. The control Apple has over its products
I'm not really interested in the Macs that Apple is offering (although seem to be decently powerful, they don't offer the configurability that does).
I think Apple/Mac is about as bad as Microsoft in some ways, and currenYou are right on so many levels. The control Apple has over its products - much like a dictatorship in a sense. You will take what we give you. If we offer you choices, these are the choices. You have to buy the machine the way you think you will want it to be - "forever". The MacBook my wife currently did allow me the ability to change drives and upgrade RAM. That has allowed it to last as long as it has.
I'm not really interested in the Macs that Apple is offering (although
seem to be decently powerful, they don't offer the configurability that
does).
--Matt
--- RATSoft/FIDO v09.14.95 [JetMail 1.01]
* Origin: STar Fleet HQ - Real Atari! bbs.sfhqbbs.org:5983 (21:3/171.0)
plus, apple has a history of making it as hard as possible to repair your own devices by shutting down if you don't have a verified part
plus, apple has a history of making it as hard as possible to repairyour
own devices by shutting down if you don't have a verified part
I never was much of an Apple user, but in 2012 I had bought a MacBook Pro (a late 2011 model, the last of the 17" version and last with an optical
completely at odds from where it started... Its ancient history, but th used nothing but off the shelf parts. It also came with full specs and schematics to make it do whatever you wanted... They need a bit of that back... somewhere along the way they traded any open thought for thisYou know what, I agree with you. While I never owned an Apple II/IIe/II+,
Apple - open vs. closedWoz (the engineer) wanted an open system. Jobs (the marketing guy) wanted everything shut down and closed up tight. I guess we know who won that
plus, apple has a history of making it as hard as possible to repair your own devices by shutting down if you don't have a verified part
I never was much of an Apple user, but in 2012 I had bought a MacBook Pro (a late 2011 model, the last of the 17" version and last with an optical drive), and upgraded its RAM myself with non-Apple branded RAM. It worked, but the laptop showed a 'warning' message that it had non-Apple RAM in it.
I never was much of an Apple user, but in 2012 I had bought a MacBook Pro
(a late 2011 model, the last of the 17" version and last with an optical
I'll be the last person to disagree, ever since it became Jobbies and post jobbies...its just become the 80's MS of the new millenium. However its completely at odds from where it started... Its ancient history, but the II+ used nothing but off the shelf parts. It also came with full specs and schematics to make it do whatever you wanted... They need a bit of that back... somewhere along the way they traded any open thought for this shitstorm they have now.
Woz (the engineer) wanted an open system. Jobs (the marketing guy) wanted everything shut down and closed up tight. I guess we know who won that one...
Mhansel739 wrote to Nightfox <=-
Yes, well that is thanks to the marketing machine we call Microsoft.
They marketed and pushed DOS and Windows and made deals with "all" the
PC manufacturers to be the default OS on their machines. And when you
have a set of new people that have little to no IT experience, that is
all they know. Good, bad, or otherwise, DOS and Windows become the
defacto standard.
Re: Re: Atari 400; meh.
By: candycane to Mhansel739 on Mon Jul 31 2023 05:42 am
plus, apple has a history of making it as hard as possible to repair
your own devices by shutting down if you don't have a verified part
I never was much of an Apple user, but in 2012 I had bought a MacBook Pro (a late 2011 model, the last of the 17" version and last with an optical drive), and upgraded its RAM myself with non-Apple branded RAM. It worked, but the laptop showed a 'warning' message that it had non-Apple RAM in it.
Nightfox
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: Digital Distortion: digdist.synchro.net (21:1/137)
Woz (the engineer) wanted an open system. Jobs (the marketing guy)
wanted everything shut down and closed up tight. I guess we know
who won that one...
Back in the.... 80s? Woz an avid pilot was involved in a plane crash. Apparently a close to death experience, changed his priorities, and he ultimately left Apple's day to day operations completely. So I think Jobbies won by default.
Spec
*** THE READER V4.50 [freeware]
--- SuperBBS v1.17-3 (Eval)
* Origin: A camel is a horse designed by a committee. (21:3/101)
Nightfox wrote to candycane <=-
I never was much of an Apple user, but in 2012 I had bought a MacBook
Pro (a late 2011 model, the last of the 17" version and last with an optical drive), and upgraded its RAM myself with non-Apple branded RAM.
It worked, but the laptop showed a 'warning' message that it had non-Apple RAM in it.
I never was much of an Apple user, but in 2012 I had bought a MacBook Pro
(a late 2011 model, the last of the 17" version and last with an optical
drive), and upgraded its RAM myself with non-Apple branded RAM. It
worked, but the laptop showed a 'warning' message that it had non-Apple
RAM in it.
I bet it's not Apple-branded RAM it's complaining about per se - I was working at a large apple shop back then and we did an upgrade program for a couple of hundred of developer Macs - increased the RAM and
replaced the SATA drive with an SSD.
Maybe the timing was off, and the laptop flagged the RAM as non-apple?
We used Crucial RAM, and I never saw that message.
Apparently a close to death experience, changed his priorities, andhe
ultimately left Apple's day to day operations completely. So I think Jobbies won by default.
Glad they survived, but it's sad they had to leave.. Then again, marketing folks probably would've won eventually.
Hmm Woz appears to have been one of the few to actively stand up to Jobs. Back then Apple corp was a little bit schizophrenic... kept in the black by Apple II sales while neglecting it almost entirely and pushing the Mac.
I'd heard Steve Jobs got a contract with Atari to develop a game for them (along with hardware to play it on), and he had Wozniak help with it but lied to him about the amount Atari paid (saying it was less than it was) so that he (Jobs) wouldn't have to share as much of the earnings with Wozniak.
Re: Re: Atari 400; meh. By: candycane to Nightfox on Thu Jul 27
2023 08:34 pm
yea! tho i personally customized my desktop a bit cuz linux (how
are you supposed to attach images on bbs?)
One thing you could do is upload the photos to a hosting site (such
as Imgur, for instance) and copy & paste links here.
Nightfox --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux * Origin: Digital Distortion: digdist.synchro.net (21:1/137)
You've got your points, obviously. Just please mind that I was not seriously criticizing.. more trying to be ironic :>
And with Tramiel... yeah.. if only he did not have sales/marketing
tactics that doomed both C= and Atari at the end...
-h1
If it weren't for a few apps I use daily that only run on Windows and
Mac I would have probably given Linux on the desktop another try (something I haven't done in 20 years).
One thing you could do is upload the photos to a hosting site (such as Imgur, for instance) and copy & paste links here.
If it weren't for a few apps I use daily that only run on Windows and Mac I would have probably given Linux on the desktop another try (something I haven't done in 20 years).
One thing you could do is upload the photos to a hosting site (such
as Imgur, for instance) and copy & paste links here.
And then run that link through something like tinyurl, some terminal programs (like syncterm) won't let me highlight a link to be able to copy/paste it. So the shorter the URL the better.
There is also the old option of uuencoding the image and then posting the text block for the other end to uudecode back into the image.
yea! tho i personally customized my desktop a bit cuz linux (how are
you supposed to attach images on bbs?)
One thing you could do is upload the photos to a hosting site (such as
Imgur, for instance) and copy & paste links here.
Or you could upload them to that particular BBS's file section. :)
One thing you could do is upload the photos to a hosting site (such as
Imgur, for instance) and copy & paste links here.
And then run that link through something like tinyurl, some terminal programs (like syncterm) won't let me highlight a link to be able to copy/paste it. So the shorter the URL the better.
There is also the old option of uuencoding the image and then posting the text block for the other end to uudecode back into the image.
What's the difference between uuencode and base64? They both seem to be email-friendly encodings..
And with Tramiel... yeah.. if only he did not have sales/marketing tactics that doomed both C= and Atari at the end...
And with Tramiel - how can you be brilliant and daft, all at the same time? Perfect example I guess. :D
Re: Re: Atari 400; meh.
By: Geri Atricks to Nightfox on Sat Aug 05 2023 10:14 pm
One thing you could do is upload the photos to a hosting site (such
as Imgur, for instance) and copy & paste links here.
Yeah, I usually use a URL shortener for things like that. But some web hosting sites (like Imgur) have links that are already fairly short and don't need to be shortened.
Yeah, I usually use a URL shortener for things like that. But some web
hosting sites (like Imgur) have links that are already fairly short and
don't need to be shortened.
Is 0x0.st fine?
I'm not familiar with 0x0.st
Honestly I'd think it would make more sense to share photos with
people here on a photo hosting site. If you wanted to share a link
to it on your BBS's file section, you'd have to first upload it to
your BBS, and I don't really see the point in uploading such photos
to your BBS's file section.. However, if you use Apache or some
other web server on a different port, it would be fairly easy to just
copy the photos there and share the link.
Yeah, I just threw that out there as an alternative suggesion. Honestly,
I think posting a tinyURL link to some 'Net site would be the best approach. :)
It's pretty straight forward if you run any kind of local web server.. album scripts are a dime a dozen, and you can just run the data directory as a share for drag and share...
What's the difference between uuencode and base64? They both seem to be email-friendly encodings..
I do want to set up a public server, but I'm also nervous I'll compromise my home net security by setting one up.
Shrug. Not sure how you're going to manage that, but it depends what you're going run it on I guess...
Shrug. Not sure how you're going to manage that, but it depends what you're going run it on I guess...
No idea either, that's why I don't run one.
I'd still rather fire up one of my Atari's than sit and look at a
Windows box. No heart...no spirit...no soul. Microsoft made sure of
that. :)
Honestly I'd think it would make more sense to share photos with
people here on a photo hosting site. If you wanted to share a link
to it on your BBS's file section, you'd have to first upload it to
your BBS, and I don't really see the point in uploading such photos
to your BBS's file section.. However, if you use Apache or some
other web server on a different port, it would be fairly easy to just
copy the photos there and share the link.
Actually was talking to that guy we mentioned in our Zoom meet that had the TT for sale... He's also got a PC in an 800xl case that runs Windows 10 and even uses the XL keyboard.
To which Commodore Clifford replies...
Actually was talking to that guy we mentioned in our Zoom meet that
had the TT for sale... He's also got a PC in an 800xl case that runs Windows 10 and even uses the XL keyboard.
I bet that would just fry your brain huh? :)
That feels wrong..
candycane
On 22 Aug 23 19:03:28 Commodore Clifford wrote...
To which Commodore Clifford replies...
Actually was talking to that guy we mentioned in our Zoom meet
that had the TT for sale... He's also got a PC in an 800xl case
that runs Windows 10 and even uses the XL keyboard.
I bet that would just fry your brain huh? :)
To which Darklord replies...
The thought of that just...boggles my mind. I meany, why? Just why?
Gutting a perfectly good 800XL to fill it with generic PC crap is (or should be!) criminal! :)
To which Commodore Clifford replies...
Well... now... maybe the innards just were damaged beyond repair, or
the innards used to restore a machine with a better case.
Let's not judge till we see it (he might bring it to VCFMW). After
all, isn't it more fun to judge when the other guy can actually SEE
you pointing and laughing at him?
Okay, that's fair. Meanwhile, I'll patiently wait to see your
reaction when someone shows up with a repainted Atari 8bit floppy
drive... :)
On 29 Aug 23 16:53:16 Darklord wrote...
Okay, that's fair. Meanwhile, I'll patiently wait to see your
reaction when someone shows up with a repainted Atari 8bit floppy drive... :)
To which Commodore Clifford replies...
That's a totally different thing. That's just blasphemy. And his
blaming it on me is just wrong.
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 66 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 09:29:26 |
Calls: | 728 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 7,666 |
Messages: | 295,327 |