1. Forum
  2. fsxNet
  3. FSX NET

  • Different areas

    From Al@21:4/106 to Avon on Tue Apr 14 13:40:28 2020
    Hello Avon,

    I just got a comment from a point I have here and he had this to say..

    === Cut ===
    FSXnet seems like a very dynamic "connected" network. It needs more
    topical conversational-style echos IMHO though.
    === Cut ===

    This is something that I have thought also, though I think I feel the same trepidation that you do.

    I am about to reply to him and give him some food for thought and suggest that he should take that up with you.

    This is just a heads up in case he does that.. :)

    I'm also interested in what others think about this and what they might have to























































































































































    say.

    Ttyl :-),
    Al

    --- GoldED+/LNX
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (21:4/106)
  • From Oli@21:3/102 to Al on Wed Apr 15 08:47:41 2020
    Al wrote (2020-04-14):

    Hello Avon,

    I just got a comment from a point I have here and he had this to say..

    === Cut ===
    FSXnet seems like a very dynamic "connected" network. It needs more
    topical conversational-style echos IMHO though.
    === Cut ===

    This is something that I have thought also, though I think I feel the
    same trepidation that you do.

    I am about to reply to him and give him some food for thought and suggest that he should take that up with you.

    This is just a heads up in case he does that.. :)

    I'm also interested in what others think about this and what they might have to say.

    I agree with your point. Most echos are meta (about BBS / FTN) and there is only one non-technical echo (FSX_GEN) that is full of meta conversations too. They are fun and important, but this is not and never was the most important part of BBSing (IMHO).
    #
    #(new paragraph for net 2 ;)
    #
    I wonder which topical conversational-style echos are missing? (btw, is it echos or echoes?)

    And let's not forget that FTNs are in its core decentralized. Getting the approval of the benevolent dictator for a new echo is helpful, but not the only























































































































































    way to start one.

    ---
    * Origin: (21:3/102)
  • From Al@21:4/106.1 to Oli on Wed Apr 15 13:15:58 2020
    On 15 Apr 2020, Oli said the following...

    I wonder which topical conversational-style echos are missing?

    That I'm not sure.

    (btw, is it echos or echoes?)

    I have always use "echoes" but I'm not sure which is correct.

    Ttyl :-),
    Al

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/04/13 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (21:4/106.1)