Testing long lines with Hub 100. See mail from apam "Oli's Messages".
0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789 012345678 9ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHI JABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGH IJ012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567 89012345678901234567890123456 789ABCDEFGHIJABCDE 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 ABCDEFGHI ABCDE
Testing long lines with Hub 100. See mail from apam "Oli's Messages".
012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567 >9ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFG >IJ0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345
789ABCDEFGHIJABCDE
123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12345678
ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI
ABCDEFGHI 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12345678
123456789 ABCDEFGHI ABCDE
Testing long lines with Hub 100. See mail from apam "Oli's
Messages".
012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567
9ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFG
IJ0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345
789ABCDEFGHIJABCDE
123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789
123456789 12345678
ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI
ABCDEFGHI
ABCDEFGHI 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789
123456789 12345678
123456789 ABCDEFGHI ABCDE
That's what I see. BBBS didn't (in this case) wrap the reply up.
Hello Oli,
Testing long lines with Hub 100. See mail from apam "Oli's
Messages".
0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789
012345678
9ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHI
JABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGH
IJ012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567
89012345678901234567890123456 789ABCDEFGHIJABCDE 123456789
123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789
123456789 ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI
ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI ABCDEFGHI 123456789 123456789 123456789
123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 ABCDEFGHI
ABCDE
That's more or less what I see. Golded has reformatted the reply.
The long lines were 960 characters long, I only count 255 characters (or256 chars including an added CR?). That is the same that
apam was seeing, lines are
cut after 255 characters (the line breaks at col 79 are from Hub 4).
there is a "8" missing
9ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFG >IJ0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345
and a "6"
That's what I see. BBBS didn't (in this case) wrap the reply up.
Now I triggered a bug in BBBS too?
That's more or less what I see. Golded has reformatted the reply.
The long lines were 960 characters long, I only count 255 characters (or 256
chars including an added CR?). That is the same that apam was seeing, lines ar
cut after 255 characters (the line breaks at col 79 are from Hub 4).
Al wrote to Oli <=-
That's more or less what I see. Golded has reformatted the reply.
The long lines were 960 characters long, I only count 255 characters (or 256
chars including an added CR?). That is the same that apam was seeing, lines ar
cut after 255 characters (the line breaks at col 79 are from Hub 4).
Yes, I think that is exactly right. I wish g00r00 was around and we
could give him input. Maybe he is reading us.. I dunno.
Yes, I think that is exactly right. I wish g00r00 was around and we
could give him input. Maybe he is reading us.. I dunno.
He is reading on Scinet at least.
I wonder if I was part of the "problem" that made g00r00 leave?
@PATH: 2/116 100 1/100
So I got your message from 1/100 via 3/100 and it only had 1 long line
of 256 chars.
@PATH: 2/116 3/100 1/100
So I got your message from 1/100 via 3/100 and it only had 1 long line
of 256 ch ars.
I wonder if I was part of the "problem" that made g00r00 leave?
Personally, I dont think you were.
Yes, I think that is exactly right. I wish g00r00 was around and we
could give him input. Maybe he is reading us.. I dunno.
He is reading on Scinet at least.
I wonder if I was part of the "problem" that made g00r00 leave?
On 01 Apr 2020 at 12:41a, alterego pondered and said...
@PATH: 2/116 3/100 1/100
So I got your message from 1/100 via 3/100 and it only had 1
long line of 256 ch ars.
and second message. What are you running to cause this? Sorry I am
behind the times on all of these but I thought your node 2/116 was
not creating things that may lead to dupes?
It's your node 1/100 that are creating the mangled dupes.
and second message. What are you running to cause this? Sorry I am behind the times on all of these but I thought your node 2/116 was not creating things that may lead to dupes?
On 04-01-20 14:48, alterego wrote to Al <=-
provided more detail around how those claims were not true. For me, it kinda turned comical - along the lines of "did that really just
happen?"
It's your node 1/100 that are creating the mangled dupes.
I've made some changes, try another test please :)
On 01 Apr 2020 at 09:37a, Oli pondered and said...
It's your node 1/100 that are creating the mangled dupes.
I've made some changes, try another test please :)
I've made some changes, try another test please :)
012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567 >9ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFG >IJ0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345 >789ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDE >GHIJ01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123 >56789ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABC >EFGHIJ012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901 >3456789ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJA >CDEFGHIJ0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789 >123456789ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHI >ABCDEFGHIJ01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567 >90123456789ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFG
IJABCDEFGHIJ
I got this via 3/100 and 4/100. I saw another in my inbound
trucated at 256 characters but BBBS trapped it as a dupe and sent
it away to dupe heaven.
I've made some changes, try another test please :)
012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567
9ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFG
IJ0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345
789ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDE
GHIJ01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123
56789ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABC
EFGHIJ012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901
3456789ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJA
CDEFGHIJ0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789
123456789ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHI
ABCDEFGHIJ01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567
90123456789ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGHIJABCDEFG
IJABCDEFGHIJ
I got this via 3/100 and 4/100. I saw another in my inbound trucated
at 256 characters but BBBS trapped it as a dupe and sent it away to
dupe heaven.
I only got the one truncated at 256 chars it seems.
I only got the one truncated at 256 chars it seems.
It's good to see messages at least trying not to change in transit.
This is unexpected that they'd get truncated at 256 characters.
I've seen file descriptions in tic files truncated at 256 characters
in times past, likely the same sort of problem.
Al wrote to Blue White <=-
Yes, I think that is exactly right. I wish g00r00 was around and we
could give him input. Maybe he is reading us.. I dunno.
He is reading on Scinet at least.
I wonder if I was part of the "problem" that made g00r00 leave?
I was never angry about what is or isn't happening and if g00r00 ever wants input from me I'll do my best to get it to him.
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 66 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 11:06:43 |
Calls: | 728 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 7,667 |
Messages: | 295,542 |