I saw an article online recently saying the state of California hasdeclared
HAM radio is no longer a benefit, and they want to dismantle he HAM radio repeater infrastructure. This seems a bit strange, and I'm wondering why?HAM
radio is still useful, isn't it?
It *can* be useful but often isn't. It's not as though emergency responders don't already have their own radio systems that work in basically the same way.
At best, hams can offer communications support to nonprofit groups who don't already have a comms infrastructure.
My understanding is that California wants to remove the amateur radio components of its emergency plans/procedures, and the want hams to remove any repeater equipment from public spaces (mountaintops, etc.) The former seems reasonable enough, not so much the latter.
still a use for it and interest in it, so I thought it was odd to hear ofa
place wanting to dismantle the HAM repeater system.
advances in communications. Since it's still around, I always thoughtthere's
still a use for it and interest in it, so I thought it was odd to hear ofa
I think the point is that it isn't doing anything useful for the state. If it's not costing them anything or causing them any trouble, they should leave it be. Perhaps they've had some trouble with the equipment or the emergency communications groups (these people *are* amateurs, sometimes overzealous, sometimes inept, sometimes both - although they can also be skilled and helpful).
When I was in the Army, stationed overseas, making phone calls was not really practical... or cheap.
But on every base, there was a MARS station where you could call via the Radio and talk with people at home... and it was free (You could
donate). I used the hell out of MARS.
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 66 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 15:29:05 |
Calls: | 755 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 7,710 |
Messages: | 293,645 |