• Age Verification Law

    From Elf@21:1/194 to ALL on Tue Mar 10 15:33:44 2026
    Okay . . . What do we all think of this AGE VERIFICATION law that will
    go into effect in California in January of 2027? It essentially effects
    all operating systems, including Linux. Thoughts?

    https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xh3t7m2l2?BbAi0l4l2_0i2d3=220


    ~Elf

    Visit our 1990's Web Site:
    http://lifeseven.com/1990s


    ... As lacking in privacy as a goldfish.
    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Win32
    * Origin: Diamond Mine Online BBS 21:1/194 bbs.dmine.net:24 (21:1/194)
  • From nblade@21:1/126 to Elf on Wed Mar 11 08:48:27 2026
    Elf wrote to ALL <=-

    Okay . . . What do we all think of this AGE VERIFICATION law that will
    go into effect in California in January of 2027? It essentially effects all operating systems, including Linux. Thoughts?


    https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xh3t7m2l2?BbAi0l4 l2_0i2d3=220


    I read a bit about this. I'm not really sure how the hell it's really
    going to work.

    Do I think this is a good idea? I'm going to have to say no. After all
    do I really want any interaction with the government from anywhere when
    I decide to use my computer. Not to mention, I don't want to have to have
    an external user account anywhere just to use my computer. We already
    suffer enought with our cell Phone in that matter.

    On the technical side of the house, are OS makers going to first ask if you are in CA or something when you install the OS or create an Account?
    Or is this California's attempt to legistate for the world? Sort of like
    what happend with car emission at one point. Are OS makers just going to
    have OS version that can not be exported to CA or something? Is it against
    the law to have a machine that was installed in AZ and taken and used in
    CA. Note I have not read the law in question. These are just musing of
    where things could always go? If external accounts are required? Could
    someone sue based on privacy concerns? To me, there are a lot of unanswered questions.

    I am going to turn this around on you. Since you posted it, What are your thoughts?



    ... MultiMail, the new multi-platform, multi-format offline reader!
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.49

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: bbs.alsgeeklab.com:2323 (21:1/126)
  • From Scuz@21:1/248 to Elf on Tue Mar 10 16:54:45 2026
    Okay . . . What do we all think of this AGE VERIFICATION law that will
    go into effect in California in January of 2027? It essentially effects all operating systems, including Linux. Thoughts?


    Could care less what California does. No disrespect of anyone here that lives there.

    |15-|07S|08cuz(TX|04!|08)

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: |08He|04X|08eD|07 - Mystic - | hexedbbs.com:1337 (21:1/248)
  • From GRiM@21:3/234 to Scuz on Tue Mar 10 16:15:32 2026
    On 10 Mar 2026, Scuz said the following...

    Could care less what California does. No disrespect of anyone here that lives there.


    I'd love to see the bump in sales that the VPN companies got when those Texas "adult verification" laws went into place last year.

    ... Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/01/27 (Raspberry Pi/32)
    * Origin: The Dark Side (21:3/234)
  • From deon@21:2/116 to Elf on Wed Mar 11 08:29:07 2026
    Re: Age Verification Law
    By: Elf to ALL on Tue Mar 10 2026 03:33 pm

    Howdy,

    Okay . . . What do we all think of this AGE VERIFICATION law that will
    go into effect in California in January of 2027? It essentially effects
    all operating systems, including Linux. Thoughts?

    https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xh3t7m2l2?BbAi0l4l2 _0i 2d3=220

    The link doesnt work for me.

    Curious to know how age verficiation will affect linux.


    ...ëîåï
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
    * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (21:2/116)
  • From Elf@21:1/194 to NBLADE on Tue Mar 10 19:03:23 2026
    Quoting Nblade to Elf <=-

    On the technical side of the house, are OS makers going to first ask
    if you are in CA or something when you install the OS or create an Account? Or is this California's attempt to legistate for the world?
    Sort of like what happend with car emission at one point. Are OS
    makers just going to have OS version that can not be exported to CA or something? Is it against the law to have a machine that was installed
    in AZ and taken and used in CA. Note I have not read the law in

    I am going to turn this around on you. Since you posted it, What are
    your thoughts?

    Well, I think it's just a trojan horse for the government to get deeper
    into our personal lives. I don't think it's a good idea at all. They
    know people are just going to put in bogus birthdates/ages. So the next
    step is to "improve" the verification process by scanning your drivers
    license or something similar.

    Until systems that hold our personal information are truly hack proof, (never) this is just a bad idea.

    Now, the problem with "Hey, it's in California, it doesn't affect us
    unless we live there" is that Colorado is already pushing a similar law through. Brazil already did - now that's a whole country. I am betting
    the EU will like this too.

    Country Status Direction
    Australia Active proposals Strong push toward OSlevel
    France Expanding mandates Considering OSlevel
    Spain Expanding mandates Aligning with OSlevel trend
    UK Strict platform laws Likely OSlevel next
    New Zealand Earlystage Evaluating OSlevel
    Brazil Already passed OSlevel + appstore level
    United States (statelevel) California leads OSlevel spreading to
    other states

    Colorado is pushing OSlevel age verificationvery explicitly. In fact, Colorados SB26051 is one of the closest copies of Californias AB1043,
    and it would require operating systems (including Linux distributions)
    to broadcast an age bracket signal to apps.

    Violations carry civil penalties of:
    Up to $2,500 per minor for negligent violations
    Up to $7,500 per minor for intentional violations
    Enforcement depends entirely on the state Attorney Generals willingness
    to bring civil actions.

    Ugh. It is just not good.

    ~Elf

    Visit our 1990's Web Site:
    http://lifeseven.com/1990s


    ... As lacking in privacy as a goldfish.
    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Win32
    * Origin: Diamond Mine Online BBS 21:1/194 bbs.dmine.net:24 (21:1/194)
  • From Elf@21:1/194 to SCUZ on Tue Mar 10 19:03:23 2026
    Quoting Scuz to Elf <=-

    Could care less what California does. No disrespect of anyone here
    that lives there.

    See my response to Nblade . . . it is already beyond California.

    ~Elf

    Visit our 1990's Web Site:
    http://lifeseven.com/1990s


    ... As lacking in privacy as a goldfish.
    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Win32
    * Origin: Diamond Mine Online BBS 21:1/194 bbs.dmine.net:24 (21:1/194)
  • From Elf@21:1/194 to DEON on Tue Mar 10 19:03:23 2026
    Quoting Deon to Elf <=-


    Curious to know how age verficiation will affect linux.

    Well, Linux community is certainly not happy about this at all. There
    are already YouTube videos on this very topic. CEO of System76 (they
    sell computers with their own, just released, COSMIC desktop on Linux)
    just released a statement on this that is spot on.

    From their blog:
    Most System76 employees installed operating systems and created accounts
    on their computer when they were under 18 Limiting a childs ability to
    explore what they can do with a computer limits their future.

    I am hoping he is right on this quote:
    Because Linux is freely distributed and anyone can install it, the bills language could technically make the person who downloads a Linux
    distribution the device manufacturer.

    And this quote of his made the most sense of all:
    The challenges we face are neither technical nor legal. The only
    solution is to educate our children about life with digital abundance.
    Throwing them into the deep end when they're 16 or 18 is too late. Its a wonderful and weird world. Yes, there are dark corners. There always
    will be. We have to teach our children what to do when they encounter
    them and we have to trust them.


    ~Elf

    Visit our 1990's Web Site:
    http://lifeseven.com/1990s


    ... The best government teaches us to govern ourselves.
    ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Win32
    * Origin: Diamond Mine Online BBS 21:1/194 bbs.dmine.net:24 (21:1/194)
  • From Scuz@21:1/248 to GRiM on Tue Mar 10 19:38:38 2026
    I'd love to see the bump in sales that the VPN companies got when those Texas "adult verification" laws went into place last year.


    yup! they're gonna make a lot of cheese! its going to be interestinf in how this all plays out.

    |15-|07S|08cuz(TX|04!|08)

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: |08He|04X|08eD|07 - Mystic - | hexedbbs.com:1337 (21:1/248)
  • From deon@21:2/116 to Elf on Wed Mar 11 10:50:37 2026
    Re: Re: Age Verification Law
    By: Elf to NBLADE on Tue Mar 10 2026 07:03 pm

    Howdy,

    Country Status Direction
    Australia Active proposals Strong push toward OSlevel

    Can you give me a source for this...


    ...ëîåï
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
    * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (21:2/116)
  • From Nightfox@21:1/137 to Scuz on Tue Mar 10 17:20:01 2026
    Re: Re: Age Verification Law
    By: Scuz to Elf on Tue Mar 10 2026 04:54 pm

    Okay . . . What do we all think of this AGE VERIFICATION law that will
    go into effect in California in January of 2027? It essentially effects
    all operating systems, including Linux. Thoughts?

    Could care less what California does. No disrespect of anyone here that

    I'm wondering how this will affect people using the software anywhere though.. What I'm wondering is if OS makers will add this feature and if it will apply to anyone anywhere, or if they'll make it only apply to users of the OS who are in California (and then, it would have to have some way to determine whether someone is in California).

    Nightfox
    --- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
    * Origin: Digital Distortion: digdist.synchro.net (21:1/137)
  • From fusion@21:1/616 to deon on Tue Mar 10 23:18:57 2026
    On 11 Mar 2026, deon said the following...

    Re: Age Verification Law
    By: Elf to ALL on Tue Mar 10 2026 03:33 pm

    Okay . . . What do we all think of this AGE VERIFICATION law that will go into effect in California in January of 2027? It essentially effects all operating systems, including Linux. Thoughts?

    Curious to know how age verficiation will affect linux.

    my guess is if it doesn't get completely blown out of the water (all people
    who could possibly implement such a thing being like "lol f.u.") it'd be implemented in a kernel module or compile time parameter. and you can guarantee there will be instructions on how to disable that all over the
    internet, probably before support is even placed in the kernel.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (21:1/616)
  • From deon@21:2/116 to fusion on Wed Mar 11 14:26:03 2026
    Re: Re: Age Verification Law
    By: fusion to deon on Tue Mar 10 2026 11:18 pm

    Howdy,

    my guess is if it doesn't get completely blown out of the water (all people who could possibly implement such a thing being like "lol f.u.") it'd be implemented in a kernel module or compile time parameter. and you can guarantee there will be instructions on how to disable that all over the internet, probably before support is even placed in the kernel.

    Not sure how a "kernel" will validate that I was born in 1970 vs being born in 2015?


    ...ëîåï
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
    * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (21:2/116)
  • From fusion@21:1/616 to Nightfox on Tue Mar 10 23:28:47 2026
    On 10 Mar 2026, Nightfox said the following...

    Re: Re: Age Verification Law
    By: Scuz to Elf on Tue Mar 10 2026 04:54 pm

    Okay . . . What do we all think of this AGE VERIFICATION law that wi
    go into effect in California in January of 2027? It essentially effe
    all operating systems, including Linux. Thoughts?

    Could care less what California does. No disrespect of anyone here t

    I'm wondering how this will affect people using the software anywhere though.. What I'm wondering is if OS makers will add this feature and
    if it will apply to anyone anywhere, or if they'll make it only apply to users of the OS who are in California (and then, it would have to have some way to determine whether someone is in California).

    i'm curious to see what apple does.. they have a surprisingly pro-privacy stance on a lot of these things.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (21:1/616)
  • From fusion@21:1/616 to deon on Tue Mar 10 23:38:50 2026
    On 11 Mar 2026, deon said the following...

    Re: Re: Age Verification Law
    By: fusion to deon on Tue Mar 10 2026 11:18 pm

    Howdy,

    my guess is if it doesn't get completely blown out of the water (all pe who could possibly implement such a thing being like "lol f.u.") it'd b implemented in a kernel module or compile time parameter. and you can guarantee there will be instructions on how to disable that all over th internet, probably before support is even placed in the kernel.

    Not sure how a "kernel" will validate that I was born in 1970 vs being born in 2015?

    i don't know how any of it's supposed to work. most people have root access to their own machines and would just disable everything related to age verification.. so i guess, what, they try to make young people download an age restricted kernel? you'd move it out of userspace in the hope a kid isn't smart enough to rebuild it?

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (21:1/616)
  • From deon@21:2/116 to fusion on Wed Mar 11 16:00:30 2026
    Re: Re: Age Verification Law
    By: fusion to deon on Tue Mar 10 2026 11:38 pm

    Howdy,

    i don't know how any of it's supposed to work. most people have root access to their own machines and would just disable everything related to age verification.. so i guess, what, they try to make young people download an age restricted kernel? you'd move it out of userspace in the hope a kid isn't smart enough to rebuild it?

    Lets say its possible that this "kernel" cannot be compromised, or worked around...

    I still dont know how the kernel would know that I was born in 1970 vs 2015.

    For me, there are too many assumptions:
    * The PC needs to be hooked up to the internet to be functional?

    * A database somewhere has to validate that I am who I say I am.

    * Who maintains said database? What if the information in it is out of date or incorrect, I cannot use a PC (that maybe I just purchased)?

    * Who protects said database, to keep the hackers out.

    * What happens when it's compromised.

    This all sounds ridiculous to me.

    Next will the story be that the police will control my car so that I cannot speed in it, or my 10 year old cannot get in it a drive it... Actually that might be good, given that it is underage teens that seem to be nicking cars these days...


    ...ëîåï
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
    * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (21:2/116)
  • From niter3@21:1/199 to Elf on Wed Mar 11 05:20:17 2026
    Okay . . . What do we all think of this AGE VERIFICATION law that will
    go into effect in California in January of 2027? It essentially effects all operating systems, including Linux. Thoughts?


    https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xh3t7m2l2?BbAi0l4l2

    What are people doing to push against this agenda? Is there anything we can do to fight it, petition it?

    ... A Skydiver is taken by the gravity of his situation.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Clutch BBS * telnet://clutchbbs.com (21:1/199)
  • From MIKE POWELL@21:1/175 to SCUZ on Wed Mar 11 07:50:00 2026
    Okay . . . What do we all think of this AGE VERIFICATION law that will go into effect in California in January of 2027? It essentially effects all operating systems, including Linux. Thoughts?


    Could care less what California does. No disrespect of anyone here that live there.

    That would be my initial reaction. However, as another posted pointed out,
    I wonder about the ripple effects and how it might/could affect users who never venture into California.

    ---
    þ BgNet 1.0á12 ÷ moe's tavern * 1-502-875-8938 * moetiki.ddns.net:27
    * Origin: Capitol City Online (21:1/175)
  • From MIKE POWELL@21:1/175 to ELF on Wed Mar 11 07:52:00 2026
    Now, the problem with "Hey, it's in California, it doesn't affect us
    unless we live there" is that Colorado is already pushing a similar law through. Brazil already did - now that's a whole country. I am betting
    the EU will like this too.

    I don't have the details, i.e. OS level, etc., but Wisconsin and Michigan
    have already tried, or are trying, to put similar intrusive age
    verification laws in. One of the southern states... Mississippi?... has tried/is trying also.

    IIRC, the EU has at least looked into it.

    It will ripple.
    I have been posting about these moves some in the FIDO Conspiracy echo.

    ---
    þ BgNet 1.0á12 ÷ moe's tavern * 1-502-875-8938 * moetiki.ddns.net:27
    * Origin: Capitol City Online (21:1/175)
  • From MIKE POWELL@21:1/175 to DEON on Wed Mar 11 07:57:00 2026
    Country Status Direction
    Australia Active proposals Strong push toward OSlevel

    Can you give me a source for this...

    I have been posting about this in FIDO Conspiracy. My source is Techradar
    so you can look it up. If you subscribe to TQWNET, there have also been Techrader-generated posts in the general tech echo, IIRC just since Monday there have been many.

    ---
    þ BgNet 1.0á12 ÷ moe's tavern * 1-502-875-8938 * moetiki.ddns.net:27
    * Origin: Capitol City Online (21:1/175)
  • From Adept@21:2/108 to Elf on Wed Mar 11 13:58:56 2026
    Okay . . . What do we all think of this AGE VERIFICATION law that will
    go into effect in California in January of 2027? It essentially effects all operating systems, including Linux. Thoughts?

    It's terrible. It won't help with anything it purports to help with, but will make a variety of problems worse.

    That said, "this is a link to a literal law that got passed somewhere" is going to be a bit challenging to remain non-political.

    Still, hopefully people can talk about their personal annoyances. E.g., regardless of what people think about the law, I'm not thrilled about the idea of giving info to my OS, which it then passes on to web sites.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Storm BBS (21:2/108)
  • From Arelor@21:2/138 to Elf on Wed Mar 11 14:31:42 2026
    Re: Age Verification Law
    By: Elf to ALL on Tue Mar 10 2026 03:33 pm

    Okay . . . What do we all think of this AGE VERIFICATION law that will
    go into effect in California in January of 2027? It essentially effects
    all operating systems, including Linux. Thoughts?


    I suspect this thread falls into the No Politics rule.

    Anyway, the people enacting or abiding to this law can choke on my dick for what I care.


    --
    gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
    --- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (21:2/138)
  • From Arelor@21:2/138 to fusion on Wed Mar 11 14:35:26 2026
    Re: Re: Age Verification Law
    By: fusion to deon on Tue Mar 10 2026 11:38 pm


    i don't know how any of it's supposed to work. most people have root access to their own machines and would just disable everything related to age verification.. so i guess, what, they try to make young people download an age restricted kernel? you'd move it out of userspace in the hope a kid isn't smart enough to rebuild it?

    Endgame is hardware attestation. ie. they only allow the sale of computers configured to boot only compliant operating systems, in this case operating systems approved by the government.


    --
    gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
    --- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (21:2/138)
  • From Adept@21:2/108 to Arelor on Wed Mar 11 21:27:52 2026
    Endgame is hardware attestation. ie. they only allow the sale of
    computers configured to boot only compliant operating systems, in this case operating systems approved by the government.

    Secure Boot already sucks.

    All these things where, in theory there are positive things that make sense, but in practice it's awful.

    Thus why, with Secure Boot, especially when doing a dual-boot system, one has to ask Microsoft servers for permission when running Linux.

    (Not that I'm a super expert on it. I like the idea of defense of root kits, but really hate the idea that someone else gets to control my computer, whether it's malware authors or Microslop.)

    Anyway, as is normal, I'll be happy to stop if anyone is bothered by the discussion in any way.

    Though I _am_ curious if there's anyone who's on the "in favor" side, given the set of people who go to BBSs in 2026.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Storm BBS (21:2/108)
  • From nblade@21:1/126 to Nightfox on Thu Mar 12 10:13:28 2026
    Nightfox wrote to Scuz <=-

    I'm wondering how this will affect people using the software anywhere though.. What I'm wondering is if OS makers will add this feature and
    if it will apply to anyone anywhere, or if they'll make it only apply
    to users of the OS who are in California (and then, it would have to
    have some way to determine whether someone is in California).

    You know that was my question. Are maker just going to apply it anywhere?
    Are they are going to be version that are havent and not have it?

    ... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.49

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: bbs.alsgeeklab.com:2323 (21:1/126)
  • From MIKE POWELL@21:1/175 to ADEPT on Thu Mar 12 08:07:00 2026
    That said, "this is a link to a literal law that got passed somewhere" is goi to be a bit challenging to remain non-political.

    Still, hopefully people can talk about their personal annoyances. E.g., regardless of what people think about the law, I'm not thrilled about the ide of giving info to my OS, which it then passes on to web sites.

    Yeah, it involes something political but also could have a direct affect
    on computers and our hobby. We will just have to try to keep it civil in
    that regard.

    ---
    þ BgNet 1.0á12 ÷ moe's tavern * 1-502-875-8938 * moetiki.ddns.net:27
    * Origin: Capitol City Online (21:1/175)
  • From Arelor@21:2/138 to Adept on Thu Mar 12 14:16:18 2026
    Re: Re: Age Verification Law
    By: Adept to Arelor on Wed Mar 11 2026 09:27 pm


    Secure Boot already sucks.

    All these things where, in theory there are positive things that make sense, but in practice it's awful.

    Thus why, with Secure Boot, especially when doing a dual-boot system, one has to ask Microsoft servers for permission when running Linux.

    I remember when they were implementing Secure Boot everywhere and I warned people it was going to suck. Lots of IT dudes were so happy about it. "Yeah, now we are going to be able to ensure we only boot approved kernels!"

    Some time after, they were so happy and telling me "I told you so. I am running this 75,000 USD Supermicroboard and it has a great Secure Board implementation. I can sign my own stuff and use my own keys. Your fears Secure Boot were going to suck were unfounded. As usual, you were wrong and you shoudl eat shit and die, Arelor"

    Some time after, those same people would buy a 200 bucks budget laptop for home

    and they could not use their own keys

    and they had no flexibility with its Secure Boot whatsoever

    because it is easy to boast functional implementations in Enterprise hardware, but consumer grade equipment always gets the corners cut.


    --
    gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
    --- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (21:2/138)
  • From Utopian Galt@21:4/108 to Elf on Thu Mar 12 22:09:00 2026
    BY: Elf (21:1/194)

    |11E|09> |10Okay . . . What do we all think of this AGE VERIFICATION law that will|07
    |11E|09> |10go into effect in California in January of 2027? It essentially effects|07
    |11E|09> |10all operating systems, including Linux. Thoughts?|07
    Even your refrigerator.



    --- WWIV 5.9.03749[Windows]
    * Origin: inland utopia * california * iutopia.duckdns.org:2023 (21:4/108)
  • From Utopian Galt@21:4/108 to Scuz on Thu Mar 12 22:10:12 2026
    BY: Scuz (21:1/248)

    |11S|09> |10Could care less what California does. No disrespect of anyone here that|07
    |11S|09> |10lives there.|07
    Its happening all over the country. You have to start calling your legislators. If you live in Colorado for example call them to say no on SB26-051


    --- WWIV 5.9.03749[Windows]
    * Origin: inland utopia * california * iutopia.duckdns.org:2023 (21:4/108)