Yes, those kinds of upgrades were very significant. I was particularly happy with upgrading from monochrome to VGA graphics and adding a sound card to my PC. At the time, my PC was a hand-me-down PC when I was 12; when I saved up some money, I was excited about buying a Sound Blaster
16 to upgrade from the Sound Blaster Pro I had. Each new upgrade
through the 90s was a very noticeable increase in speed and capability. It was an exciting time.
I got my first computer at the start of 1991, it was a VZ 200. Between 1991 and 1994, I had the VZ 200, a Vic 20, Commodore 64 and an XT. Then I was loaned in 1994 an Amstrad PC2386. So I saw some rapid changes with these second hand machines.
The most interesting was the 386, because of the great multimedia capability, the colour monitor, and all the potentials it had. These days, I kind of wax nostalgic about these old machines, in particular the XT which was kind of like a "classic car". Slow, clunky, but stylish. The monochrome monitor with the CGA text was also kind of unique.
Similar with me - Before I built my current desktop in 2019, I'd had my previous PC for about 8 years, and I probably could have kept using it
for longer. These days, I think PCs can last longer because newer upgrades just aren't quite as significant as they used to be.
I'm quite surprised how well this machine has held up. I can run a modern web browser, modern sites, Zoom, everything just fine. It used to be that software would overtake your hardware, but that hasn't happened, except for games. Oddly, the only non-game software which my machine doesn't support that I used to use regularly is a Gemini client!
This I think is also in part to Linux, and how it uses less resources. Even my Laptop, a Thinkpad T43 is still useful, though web browsing is one activity that can be slow.
The fact is, computers a while ago become fast enough to do what we mostly need them to do, with a good interface. I would argue this occurred 20 years ago or so, but really, there is an excess of computing power for most household computing tasks now.
I've used Linux quite a bit over the last 20 years, mainly in work situations, but some at home as well. I've considered switching to
Linux on my main desktop PC at home, but the thing that keeps me using Windows is the software I use. I think the main thing is I like playing PC games sometimes, and most PC games are developed for Windows first.
True. I was happy with a dual-boot scenario, using Linux most of the time, and using Windows when required. But the need to use Windows waned over time, even for games and now, I don't need it, even for games. Even if I did need Windows to play some games, I'd still rather dual boot.
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/24 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)