• The missing routing between message networks

    From shinobi@21:1/153 to All on Sun Jul 22 19:38:40 2018
    Is it possible to post from FSX to FIDO?

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A38 2018/01/01 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: INFOLINKA BBS (21:1/153)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to shinobi on Mon Jul 23 08:53:00 2018
    On 07-22-18 19:38, shinobi wrote to All <=-

    Is it possible to post from FSX to FIDO?

    As far as I know, no.


    ... IBM = Institute of Black Magic
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)
  • From shinobi@21:1/153 to Vk3jed on Mon Jul 23 00:22:05 2018
    Is it possible to post from FSX to FIDO?

    As far as I know, no.

    Someone still had some clean head. Thanks for that.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A38 2018/01/01 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: INFOLINKA BBS (21:1/153)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to shinobi on Mon Jul 23 10:41:00 2018
    On 07-23-18 00:22, shinobi wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    Is it possible to post from FSX to FIDO?

    As far as I know, no.

    Someone still had some clean head. Thanks for that.

    It would be nice to, and back in the day, there used to be gateways between Fidonet and othernets that allowed netmail to pass, but apparently today's politics gets in the way. :(


    ... File not found. Should I fake it? (Y/N)
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)
  • From Avon@21:1/101 to shinobi on Mon Jul 23 15:30:19 2018
    On 07/22/18, shinobi pondered and said...

    Is it possible to post from FSX to FIDO?

    sorry i am travelling so replies may be slow question do you mean netmail or echomail? or both?

    best, paul

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/21 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)
  • From Avon@21:1/101 to Vk3jed on Mon Jul 23 15:32:55 2018
    On 07/23/18, Vk3jed pondered and said...

    It would be nice to, and back in the day, there used to be gateways between Fidonet and othernets that allowed netmail to pass, but
    apparently today's politics gets in the way. :(


    hi tony im not sure where you got that impression from?

    i dont think its the case.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/21 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to Avon on Mon Jul 23 16:50:00 2018
    On 07-23-18 15:32, Avon wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    hi tony im not sure where you got that impression from?

    i dont think its the case.

    It came up in a discussion on Fidonet recently. :)


    ... Reality is a constant intrusion on my dreams.
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)
  • From Avon@21:1/101 to Vk3jed on Mon Jul 23 19:15:02 2018
    On 07/23/18, Vk3jed pondered and said...

    On 07-23-18 15:32, Avon wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    hi tony im not sure where you got that impression from?

    i dont think its the case.

    It came up in a discussion on Fidonet recently. :)

    can you point me to the echo please... thanks :-)

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/21 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to Avon on Mon Jul 23 17:52:00 2018
    On 07-23-18 19:15, Avon wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    On 07/23/18, Vk3jed pondered and said...

    On 07-23-18 15:32, Avon wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    hi tony im not sure where you got that impression from?

    i dont think its the case.

    It came up in a discussion on Fidonet recently. :)

    can you point me to the echo please... thanks :-)

    Ancient history now (as is anything older than a few days ;) ).


    ... It's people like you who make people like me above average.
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)
  • From Avon@21:1/101 to Vk3jed on Mon Jul 23 20:05:17 2018
    On 07/23/18, Vk3jed pondered and said...

    i dont think its the case.

    It came up in a discussion on Fidonet recently. :)

    can you point me to the echo please... thanks :-)

    Ancient history now (as is anything older than a few days ;) ).


    ok but which echoarea? i just want to read what was discussed.

    thanks.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/21 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to Avon on Mon Jul 23 18:38:00 2018
    On 07-23-18 20:05, Avon wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    ok but which echoarea? i just want to read what was discussed.

    I _think_ it was in FN_SYSOP, but can't be 100% certain. :)


    ... Cut my pizza into six pieces please. I can't eat eight.
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)
  • From shinobi@21:1/153 to Vk3jed on Mon Jul 23 14:10:03 2018
    It would be nice to, and back in the day, there used to be gateways between Fidonet and othernets that allowed netmail to pass, but
    apparently today's politics gets in the way. :(

    Sad story. Could You remember what any of that kind of gateway was named?

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A38 2018/01/01 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: INFOLINKA BBS (21:1/153)
  • From shinobi@21:1/153 to Avon on Mon Jul 23 14:11:32 2018
    sorry i am travelling so replies may be slow question do you mean
    netmail or echomail? or both?

    I'm not sure whether the echomail would make sense. I guess when You have moderator You don't want traffic pass through gateway from different echomail network.

    I would certainly make bigger sense for netmail.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A38 2018/01/01 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: INFOLINKA BBS (21:1/153)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to shinobi on Tue Jul 24 06:49:00 2018
    On 07-23-18 14:10, shinobi wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    It would be nice to, and back in the day, there used to be gateways between Fidonet and othernets that allowed netmail to pass, but
    apparently today's politics gets in the way. :(

    Sad story. Could You remember what any of that kind of gateway was
    named?

    I did google a while back and found a few DOS packages that can gate between FTNs, but I couldn't recall any now.


    ... I wondered why the baseball was getting bigger. Then it hit me!
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)
  • From shinobi@21:1/153 to Vk3jed on Mon Jul 23 22:12:25 2018
    I did google a while back and found a few DOS packages that can gate between FTNs, but I couldn't recall any now.

    Could be Phython writable. Once the QWK has been used for it. But I would not rely on my memory.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A38 2018/01/01 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: INFOLINKA BBS (21:1/153)
  • From Avon@21:1/101 to shinobi on Tue Jul 24 21:09:46 2018
    On 07/23/18, shinobi pondered and said...

    I'm not sure whether the echomail would make sense. I guess when You have moderator You don't want traffic pass through gateway from different echomail network.

    I would certainly make bigger sense for netmail.

    I agree and am going to fix this. It seems like a good move to me. Stay
    tuned. :)

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/21 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)
  • From Avon@21:1/101 to Vk3jed on Tue Jul 24 21:10:10 2018
    On 07/23/18, Vk3jed pondered and said...

    ok but which echoarea? i just want to read what was discussed.

    I _think_ it was in FN_SYSOP, but can't be 100% certain. :)

    Had a quick look but not joy, thanks anyways...

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/21 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)
  • From BitByter@21:4/105 to shinobi on Tue Jul 24 02:22:43 2018
    Hello shinobi!

    23 Jul 18 14:10, you wrote to Vk3jed:

    It would be nice to, and back in the day, there used to be
    gateways between Fidonet and othernets that allowed netmail to
    pass, but apparently today's politics gets in the way. :(

    Sad story. Could You remember what any of that kind of gateway was
    named?

    In FidoNet, there used to be ZoneGates that would handle inter-zone netmail. In theory, it would be possible to setup something similar for handling netmail between FidoNet and othernets.

    There also exist software packages such as BlackHole which allow gating echomail from one FTN network to another.

    BitByter

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20170303
    * Origin: Phoenix BBS * phoenix.bnbbbs.net (21:4/105)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to shinobi on Tue Jul 24 19:30:00 2018
    On 07-23-18 22:12, shinobi wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    I did google a while back and found a few DOS packages that can gate between FTNs, but I couldn't recall any now.

    Could be Phython writable. Once the QWK has been used for it. But I
    would not rely on my memory.

    I don't understand what you're saying here.


    ... AAcckk!! II''mm iinn hhaallff dduupplleexx
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to Avon on Tue Jul 24 19:31:00 2018
    On 07-24-18 21:10, Avon wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    On 07/23/18, Vk3jed pondered and said...

    ok but which echoarea? i just want to read what was discussed.

    I _think_ it was in FN_SYSOP, but can't be 100% certain. :)

    Had a quick look but not joy, thanks anyways...

    No probs. As I said, "ancient history" (anything older than a day or two) - detailed info not available in my head. :D


    ... Violence is the last word of the incompetant. Also the first.
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to Avon on Tue Jul 24 20:11:00 2018
    On 07-24-18 21:09, Avon wrote to shinobi <=-

    I would certainly make bigger sense for netmail.

    I agree and am going to fix this. It seems like a good move to me. Stay tuned. :)

    I'm happy for you to test to z432 if you want to do a bit of FTN DXing. :D


    ... Luxuriantly hand-crafted from only the finest ASCII.
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)
  • From shinobi@21:1/153 to Vk3jed on Tue Jul 24 19:56:33 2018
    Sad story. Could You remember what any of that kind of gateway was named?

    I did google a while back and found a few DOS packages that can gate between FTNs, but I couldn't recall any now.

    Remember the discussion here regarding the abandonware? It's a huge shame lot of programs just dissapeared or are no running anymore. That's very true on Windows. In the new WIN it's very difficult to run old software. I'm not sure what program what that was. But I coldn't make it working.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A38 2018/01/01 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: INFOLINKA BBS (21:1/153)
  • From shinobi@21:1/153 to Avon on Tue Jul 24 19:58:41 2018
    I agree and am going to fix this. It seems like a good move to me. Stay tuned. :)

    That sound wonderful. If You'd find any path. I'd be pleased to read about it.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A38 2018/01/01 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: INFOLINKA BBS (21:1/153)
  • From shinobi@21:1/153 to BitByter on Tue Jul 24 20:03:01 2018
    In FidoNet, there used to be ZoneGates that would handle inter-zone netmail. In theory, it would be possible to setup something similar for handling netmail between FidoNet and othernets.

    There also exist software packages such as BlackHole which allow gating echomail from one FTN network to another.

    That's possible where my IDEA came from. I remember being (I guess) ZONE 42. And de facto most of the conferences weren't routed anywhere else than
    locally. It were in my language. And I could somehow subscribe other ECHO
    AREAS on BBS and download it to QWK reader. But I guess I could also post to other zones via netmail. (really unsure about all that above ... it's quite a long time).

    But when there would be routing between networks. I guess there would have
    been some central point where the messages would be received and forwarded.
    And that's the weak point. The beauty of Internet it's in it's decentralization. I mean You can contact any node on any subnet (if not
    BLOCKE by active element). And if You make one element responsible for something very important. Then it becomes single point of failure.

    Just thinking. Sorry if that above doesn't make sense.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A38 2018/01/01 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: INFOLINKA BBS (21:1/153)
  • From shinobi@21:1/153 to Vk3jed on Tue Jul 24 20:04:50 2018
    Could be Phython writable. Once the QWK has been used for it. But I would not rely on my memory.

    I don't understand what you're saying here.


    Sorry I mixed too much together. The QWKNet definitely wasn't use for
    transport of mail from one zone to another. In the fact it has no addresses.
    If I recall correctly the QWKNet consist of BBSes where only there is many Nodes and one Hub.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A38 2018/01/01 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: INFOLINKA BBS (21:1/153)
  • From Al@21:4/106 to shinobi on Tue Jul 24 14:19:55 2018
    Re: Re: QWKNet
    By: shinobi to Vk3jed on Tue Jul 24 2018 08:04 pm

    Sorry I mixed too much together. The QWKNet definitely wasn't use for transport of mail from one zone to another. In the fact it has no addresses.

    I help run a network in zone 32 that serves BBSs by QWK or FTN (in zone 32) at their choice. Buy yes, there is no (FTN) addressing for QWK nodes. There is addressing (by BBSID) but it is completely different than FTN.

    If I recall correctly the QWKNet consist of BBSes where only
    there is many Nodes and one Hub.

    There can be more than one hub. I get DOVE-Net by QWK networking from Vertrauen as most of the nodes do, but I could get it from any BBS that chooses to hub for that QWK network.

    The same is true for the zone 32 net that I help with. Right now there is a small number of nodes (both QWK and FTN) and they all get their mail from the same hub but as the network grows the number of hubs (both QWK and FTN) could grow. Only time/need will tell.

    Ttyl :-),
    Al


    ... If it's not on fire, it's a software problem.
    --- SBBSecho 3.05-Linux
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (21:4/106)
  • From shinobi@21:1/153 to Al on Tue Jul 24 23:11:05 2018
    I help run a network in zone 32 that serves BBSs by QWK or FTN (in zone 32) at their choice. Buy yes, there is no (FTN) addressing for QWK
    nodes. There is addressing (by BBSID) but it is completely different
    than FTN.

    I pull mails from vert via qwk too. I configured my qwk account to download DOVE. I already posted several posts successfully. What I didn't know was the routing,adressing etc.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A38 2018/01/01 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: INFOLINKA BBS (21:1/153)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to shinobi on Wed Jul 25 11:15:00 2018
    On 07-24-18 20:04, shinobi wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    Sorry I mixed too much together. The QWKNet definitely wasn't use for transport of mail from one zone to another. In the fact it has no addresses. If I recall correctly the QWKNet consist of BBSes where only there is many Nodes and one Hub.

    QWKNet isn't relevant to the discussion here, that just muddied the waters. :-)
    Actually, Synchronet allows for more complex topologies than a simple hub and spoke setup when using QWKNet. I also like that Synchronet can do QWK netmail, which is very cool. :) But all of this is an aside.


    ... Married by a judge; should've asked for a jury. -Groucho
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to Al on Wed Jul 25 13:26:00 2018
    On 07-24-18 14:19, Al wrote to shinobi <=-

    I help run a network in zone 32 that serves BBSs by QWK or FTN (in zone 32) at their choice. Buy yes, there is no (FTN) addressing for QWK
    nodes. There is addressing (by BBSID) but it is completely different
    than FTN.

    Yep, completely different animals. And QWK addressing/routing is only supported by Synchronet AFAIK, though the specs are open, so any BBS author could add it to their system. The QWK netmail routing reminds me of UUCP bang path addressing.

    There can be more than one hub. I get DOVE-Net by QWK networking from Vertrauen as most of the nodes do, but I could get it from any BBS that chooses to hub for that QWK network.

    My QWK nodes are welcome to take a feed of DOVE from me. I don't think any ever have.

    The same is true for the zone 32 net that I help with. Right now there
    is a small number of nodes (both QWK and FTN) and they all get their
    mail from the same hub but as the network grows the number of hubs
    (both QWK and FTN) could grow. Only time/need will tell.

    Let it evolve. :)


    ... Today's extravagance becomes tomorrow's necessity.
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)
  • From shinobi@21:1/153 to Vk3jed on Wed Jul 25 05:17:41 2018
    QWKNet isn't relevant to the discussion here, that just muddied the waters. :-) Actually, Synchronet allows for more complex topologies than
    a simple hub and spoke setup when using QWKNet. I also like that Synchronet can do QWK netmail, which is very cool. :) But all of this
    is an aside.

    I must be honest. I wasn't able to configure the QWKNet on MBBS. Somehow when
    I tried to configure active FTP and then tried to pick up mail from second system it failed. Well... I created the QWKNet account, password, everything
    on Phoibos. And then picked up mail on Jupyter. It did connect, it did pick
    up packet. But it didn't import any mail to Jupyter. I think it shouldn't be necessary to run mutil in that case. And I guess it's needed to configure the ECHOMAIL area as part of QWKNet. But A39 somehow didn't transfer my mails between the two systems. On Linux x64. Any idea what could have I done wrong?

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A38 2018/01/01 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: INFOLINKA BBS (21:1/153)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to shinobi on Wed Jul 25 20:35:00 2018
    On 07-25-18 05:17, shinobi wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    I must be honest. I wasn't able to configure the QWKNet on MBBS.
    Somehow when I tried to configure active FTP and then tried to pick up mail from second system it failed. Well... I created the QWKNet
    account, password, everything on Phoibos. And then picked up mail on Jupyter. It did connect, it did pick up packet. But it didn't import
    any mail to Jupyter. I think it shouldn't be necessary to run mutil in that case. And I guess it's needed to configure the ECHOMAIL area as
    part of QWKNet. But A39 somehow didn't transfer my mails between the
    two systems. On Linux x64. Any idea what could have I done wrong?

    Hmm, no idea on this one. Never used MBBS and never used QWKNet on Mystic (only used FTN with Mystic).


    ... Chuck Norris can divide by zero.
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)
  • From Al@21:4/106 to shinobi on Wed Jul 25 09:37:51 2018
    Re: Re: QWKNet
    By: shinobi to Vk3jed on Wed Jul 25 2018 05:17 am

    I must be honest. I wasn't able to configure the QWKNet on MBBS.

    Do you mean Mystic here?

    it did pick up packet. But it didn't import any mail to Jupyter. I think it shouldn't be necessary to run mutil in that case.

    No, if you are doing QWK net transfers only qwkpoll is needed.

    And I guess it's needed to configure the ECHOMAIL area as part of QWKNet. But A39 somehow didn't transfer my mails between the two systems. On Linux x64. Any idea what could have I done wrong?

    The QWK message areas need to have the QWK-Network and QWK Base ID set. The base ID can be different from hub to hub. The output of qwkpoll should give hints if there are any problems.

    Ttyl :-),
    Al


    ... All real programs contain errors.
    --- SBBSecho 3.05-Linux
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (21:4/106)
  • From shinobi@21:1/153 to Vk3jed on Wed Jul 25 16:34:22 2018
    Hmm, no idea on this one. Never used MBBS and never used QWKNet on
    Mystic (only used FTN with Mystic).


    Sorry about that.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A38 2018/01/01 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: INFOLINKA BBS (21:1/153)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to shinobi on Thu Jul 26 09:39:00 2018
    On 07-25-18 16:34, shinobi wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    Hmm, no idea on this one. Never used MBBS and never used QWKNet on
    Mystic (only used FTN with Mystic).


    Sorry about that.

    No probs. I use Synchronet for my QWK networking, its QWKNet support is very comprehensive. Mystic's is said to be good too, though I haven't tried it, as I said.


    ... Today has been a long year!!!!!!!!!!
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)
  • From Avon@21:1/101 to shinobi on Sat Jul 28 16:16:02 2018

    I agree and am going to fix this. It seems like a good move to me. St tuned. :)

    That sound wonderful. If You'd find any path. I'd be pleased to read
    about it.

    please check my post in fsx_gen ... I've added a NETMAIL.TXT file also to the next infopack :)

    Best, Paul

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A39 2018/04/21 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)