Anybody used this MX Linux distro for much of anything?
Been toying around with a few distros lately and this one has caught my
eye. It's another Debian-based with ties to AntiX and Mepis. Seems
pretty well done compared to others I've seen, and the real bonus is
that it doesn't use 'systemd'.
So just wondering if anyone has used it for a while, and what you may
think of it... Thanks for input.
... Sometimes you get the elevator, and sometimes you get the shaft.
So just wondering if anyone has used it for a while, and what you may think of it... Thanks for input.
I think you don't gain
much by
moving from Debian/Devuan to MX Linux but you are placing yourself further
downstream which is always problematic.
Richard Falken wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Anybody used this MX Linux distro for much of anything?
Been toying around with a few distros lately and this one has caught my
eye. It's another Debian-based with ties to AntiX and Mepis. Seems
pretty well done compared to others I've seen, and the real bonus is
that it doesn't use 'systemd'.
So just wondering if anyone has used it for a while, and what you may
think of it... Thanks for input.
I have some MX Linux DVDs that came with Linux Magazine and have
used them as last resort / emergency installs for workstations at
work.
I think it ships with systemd by default, though. I think it is
just not enabled.
MX Linux is good for eye candy but I personally don't think it
makes sense to install it if you have a Devuan DVD available. I
think you don't gain much by moving from Debian/Devuan to MX
Linux but you are placing yourself further downstream which is
always problematic.
So well, it works more often than not, but it does not bring
anything new to the table. You can do much worse than installing
MX Linux, certainly.
Gerrit Kuehn wrote to Dan Clough <=-
So just wondering if anyone has used it for a while, and what you may think of it... Thanks for input.
I've installed it on a test system as it looks like a promising
candidate for workstations. Didn't have much time to really test
it so far, though.
Anyone having a URL where I could download
some spare time (preferrably well compressed ;-)?
I've installed it on a test system as it looks like a promising
candidate for workstations. Didn't have much time to really test
it so far, though.
Yes, I agree that it has real potential. I like some of the custom "tools" / tweaks that they package with it.
Gerrit Kuehn wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I've installed it on a test system as it looks like a promising
candidate for workstations. Didn't have much time to really test
it so far, though.
Yes, I agree that it has real potential. I like some of the custom "tools" / tweaks that they package with it.
You just got me to install it on another notebook to toy with it
more. I have a couple of machines still running Sabayon (which
has finally been discontinued two days ago - so I guess I need
some kind of follow-up system rather sooner than later).
Cool, let me know what you think of it after using it a bit. Thanks.
The repository management allows to use standard Debian packages
as well as MX-provided things and flatpaks. I didn't really use the latter before, but it had stuff like discord and zoom available, so I didn't have to download and install these manually.
Dan Clough wrote to Gerrit Kuehn <=-
Cool, let me know what you think of it after using it a bit. Thanks.
Gerrit Kuehn wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Cool, let me know what you think of it after using it a bit. Thanks.
I did some config stuff yesterday, mainly installing packages,
creating users, setting up desktop etc. Everything went quite
well so far. The repository management allows to use standard
Debian packages as well as MX-provided things and flatpaks. I
didn't really use the latter before, but it had stuff like
discord and zoom available, so I didn't have to download and
install these manually. Maybe I'll hand over the system to my
family and ask them all to check if they think this will be a
good follow-up distro for our familiy's computers.
Gerrit Kuehn wrote to Dan Clough <=-
The repository management allows to use standard Debian packages
as well as MX-provided things and flatpaks. I didn't really use the
latter before, but it had stuff like discord and zoom available, so I didn't have to download and install these manually.
As a follow-up: We have several HP printers here, so installing
hplip is the way to go. We have one old MFP among these that
requires the additional hplip binary plugin to allow scanning
over network (which is a very nice feature we rely on heavily).
This plugin didn't install properly, but that's probably more
HP's fault (hp-setup needs to install it). Actually, I have never
been able to get it installed without any manual interaction on
any system I tried (be it FreeBSD, Gentoo, Sabayon, MX or
whatever). On the bright side, the "usual" tricks worked here,
too, so I could just use the commandline to get everything going.
Now I have both xsane and HP's simple scanner tool using the MFP
scanner over the network.
Brian Rogers wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Cool, let me know what you think of it after using it a bit. Thanks.
Is that a port of Devuan? I've been using Devuan with
TrinityDesktop now for a few years and have had good luck with
it. The only downfall is upgrading it. Devuan itself is fine but
Trinity often will choke. I have to restore my live backup on a
test machine, upgrade it there, then restore that machine to my
live machine. Not so efficient but effective.
Sweet. I also use an HP MFP over the network for scanning, but just
do
it through the printer's "webscan" function via a browser. Works
fine
for the simple scanning I do occasionally.
Sounds like another "+" in the MX column. ;-)
Gerrit Kuehn wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Sweet. I also use an HP MFP over the network for scanning, but just
do it through the printer's "webscan" function via a browser. Works
fine for the simple scanning I do occasionally.
Yes, mine is old (an CM2320FXI), it doesn't support scanning via
the webui. Oh, and just in case I forgot to tell: we're XFCE
users, so that's the version I'm talking about here (not KDE,
fluxbox or what else they may offer).
Sounds like another "+" in the MX column. ;-)
For our use case, definitely yes. I'll ask the others what they
think and need. My wife is a teacher and needs to be able to run
some strange software for school. Discord will definitely make
our son happy, but he also has a couple of other things the uses regularly. My parents and our daughter are usually fine when they
can use scanner and printer, do email, webbrowsing and the
occasional text document or spreadsheet.
Dan Clough wrote to Brian Rogers <=-
No, it's based on Debian, but not Devuan related. Affiliated with
Antix and Mepis also. It seems like a pretty solid distro to me, and
has been #1 on the Distrowatch "popularity list" (which is somewhat meaningless) for quite a while now.
More info here: https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=mx
Brian Rogers wrote to Dan Clough <=-
No, it's based on Debian, but not Devuan related. Affiliated with
Antix and Mepis also. It seems like a pretty solid distro to me, and
has been #1 on the Distrowatch "popularity list" (which is somewhat meaningless) for quite a while now.
More info here: https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=mx
Cool, perhaps I'll give it a look. As a partner developer with
Debian I'm interested in the various forks. I prefer Devuan as
I'm not in favor of systemd.
Excellent. It is an excellent distro from what I've seen, and what you're seeing. I'm a longtime Slackware user, and honestly can't see myself switching away from it, but lately I've gotten a little fed up with how it's going, and this distro (MX) is the only one I've found
that makes me even wonder if it's a possible replacement.
the real bonus is
that it doesn't use 'systemd'.
Dan Clough wrote to Brian Rogers <=-
I think it's worth a look. Not sure if you saw earlier in the thread,
I mentioned that MX doesn't use systemd by default. It's included, but not enabled. That's getting to be a rare thing now, and matters to me,
as well. If you do check it out, your feedback would be appreciated!
Benny Pedersen wrote to Dan Clough <=-
the real bonus is
that it doesn't use 'systemd'.
so now you are ready to use gentoo ?
if i really need precompiled things i would precompile it self :)
Brian Rogers wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I think it's worth a look. Not sure if you saw earlier in the thread,
I mentioned that MX doesn't use systemd by default. It's included, but not enabled. That's getting to be a rare thing now, and matters to me,
as well. If you do check it out, your feedback would be appreciated!
Yes I saw that. Devuan has the systemd libs available but is
sysvinit.
That with TrinityDesktop (kde3 rewritten) is a decent
system to use imho.
Assuming one likes KDE to begin with, perhaps. I can't stand it
myself, and have used XFCE for many years. I'd use Gnome before KDE...
;-)
Hello Dan;
Assuming one likes KDE to begin with, perhaps. I can't stand it myself, and have used XFCE for many years. I'd use Gnome before KDE...
;-)
I've never liked XFCE or Gnome. XFCE I find to be sloppy and Gnome is OK, I'm just not a
fanatic of it. I can't stand any of the newer "plasma" desktops either.
... I phoned the local ramblers club but they just went on and on.
Richard Falken wrote to Brian Rogers <=-
I just hate all of them. Anything more featureful than Fluxbox is
bloat! And Fluxbox is stepping on the line...
That said, XFCE works ok for workstations at $job because people seems
to get them very quickly and it is easy on the shabby computers we
have.
Richard Falken wrote to Brian Rogers <=-
That said, XFCE works ok for workstations at $job because people seems
to get them very quickly and it is easy on the shabby computers we
have.
Brian Rogers wrote to Richard Falken <=-
I actually prefer NO desktop. Just give me terminal screens and I'm a happy camper, but for a desktop I do prefer the old KDE3 rewritten by
the trinity team.
That brings up an interesting thought - how much eye candy and UI
bloat is needed in a workplace?
I need to be able to run a menu and run multiple programs, any WM
would do that capably. Why not standardize on a simple WM?
Kurt Weiske wrote to Brian Rogers <=-
I'm returning to the telnet/shell game, but I'm getting to appreciate a shell window and tmux.
Richard Falken wrote to Brian Rogers <=-
That said, XFCE works ok for workstations at $job because people seems to get them very quickly and it is easy on the shabby computers we have.
That brings up an interesting thought - how much eye candy and UI bloat is needed in a workplace? I need to be able to run a menu and run multiple programs, any WM would do that capably. Why not standardize on a simple WM?
... Centrifugal force reacts to the rotating frame of reference.
That said, XFCE works ok for workstations at $job because people
seems to get them very quickly
and it is easy on the shabby computers we have.
That said, XFCE works ok for workstations at $job because people
seems to get them very quickly and it is easy on the shabby computers we have.
That's about why I'm using it, too. And I have it on my personal
desktops to be able to fix issues or explain how to use it to other people. For my own use cases, something like icewm would probably be enough.
Heck, even mwm might do it, I lived with it for years in the 1990ies.
in future there would be just linux kernels with android apps on
windows, office 365 for ever :)
Keep the linux kernel and ditch the rest. That would have easily
gotten you a +1 instead.
sadly just without the sources :/
i postted this servial years to late to make fun of it, i admit this,
but following windows now that its more linux software in windows then what it had been before is atleast to see some hope that even windows users see the light of open precompiled softwere, sadly just without
the sources :/
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 66 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 16:42:24 |
Calls: | 728 |
Files: | 7,667 |
Messages: | 295,610 |