Former Z1C Janis Kracht had mentioned that it was
okay for sysops and moderators to exempt themselves
from this policy, as they were free to use whatever
name they wanted to go by. But other participants
and lurkers were not free to do so, as policy didn't
cover them at all. In which case they had to use
their real name in order to participate, or even
just to lurk without posting messages.
But how a person in Fidonet can prove that his name is real? IMHO, I
can't do it even if I wanted to. ;-)
You dont have to prove it, it is enough that you tell us so. ;)
Former Z1C Janis Kracht had mentioned that it was
okay for sysops and moderators to exempt themselves
from this policy, as they were free to use whatever
name they wanted to go by. But other participants
and lurkers were not free to do so, as policy didn't
cover them at all. In which case they had to use
their real name in order to participate, or even
just to lurk without posting messages.
But how a person in Fidonet can prove that his name is real? IMHO, I
can't do it even if I wanted to. ;-)
Hello Tommi,From Lee Lofaso To Tommi Koivula
I can only tell you a name somebody else has given me.Former Z1C Janis Kracht had mentioned that it was
okay for sysops and moderators to exempt themselves
from this policy, as they were free to use whatever
name they wanted to go by. But other participants
and lurkers were not free to do so, as policy didn't
cover them at all. In which case they had to use
their real name in order to participate, or even
just to lurk without posting messages.
But how a person in Fidonet can prove that his name is real? IMHO, IYou dont have to prove it, it is enough that you tell us so. ;)
can't do it even if I wanted to. ;-)
Does that count?
--Lee
But how a person in Fidonet can prove that his name is real? IMHO, I
can't do it even if I wanted to.
You dont have to prove it, it is enough that you tell us so.
I don't undestand why they invented a worthless rule.
IBut how a person in Fidonet can prove that his name is real? IMHO,
can't do it even if I wanted to.
You dont have to prove it, it is enough that you tell us so.
I don't undestand why they invented a worthless rule.
it wasn't and still isn't worthless... it is a safety thing... if someone posts something illegal, there's a known entity to look at since their name
is on the post...
it wasn't and still isn't worthless... it is a safety thing... if someone posts something illegal, there's a known entity to look at since their
name is on the post...
Their username is tied in to their email address. So it would
not take much to find out whodoneit.
On 2019 Jul 25 20:35:28, you wrote to Tommi Koivula:--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v7.0
But how a person in Fidonet can prove that his name is real? IMHO, I
can't do it even if I wanted to.
You dont have to prove it, it is enough that you tell us so.
I don't undestand why they invented a worthless rule.
it wasn't and still isn't worthless... it is a safety thing... if
someone posts something illegal, there's a known entity to look at
since their name is on the post...
)\/(ark
Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them. ... An army marches on its stomach. - Napolean
---
* Origin: (1:3634/12.73)
The name means nothing, being able to trace it back to the person who wrote
it does,
in Fidonet tracing it back to the source can be done,
so wether the name is real or not is mute.
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 66 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 16:28:17 |
Calls: | 728 |
Files: | 7,667 |
Messages: | 295,603 |