Bj”rn Felten wrote to nathanael culver <=-
They don't want bulletins, they want to join Fidonet.
Why? If not for the bulletins, then what?
The file areas? http://eljaco.se/FILES/
On line games? How can ANSI-only games compete with WoW and
other modern games?
Nah, I think that you and several others are on a dead end if
you try to attract new users to fidonet with 30yo BBS programs.
Sorry...
Nah, I think that you and several others are on a dead end if you try to attract new users to fidonet with 30yo BBS programs. Sorry...
Huh? I'm a new fidonet user.
Ignore him and let's keep moving Fidonet forward.
And that "About Joining Fidonet" page is clear: "You wanna join Fidonet?
We'd
rather you just go away, but if you insist go chase down this, search
for that,
and try not to bother us too much, 'K?"
Yes Nathanael, that is a total disaster!
The simple fact, that it is so easy to join fidonet when it comes to the original idea, the bulletins, is even to someone that's been connected to the fidonet BBS network for more than three decades like me, totally incomprehensible.
Alas, we have all those self-appointed powers that will struggle to their death before they give up their private little fiefdoms. But the more bulletin users we can attract, the sooner we can make fidonet great again. At least that's what I believe.
All they need to do, if the bulletins are what they want, is toclick
*CLICK* on (and yes, if you are using a modern FTN editor, you can
on a link) e.g. the link in my origin line.
They don't want bulletins, they want to join Fidonet.
And don't you already have to be connected to Fidonet to see your origin line?
I think that's part of the point the others are making here: you have a totally different prospective audience in mind.
For you it's folks already familiar with the BBS scene and have a working acquaintance with its vocabulary and technology. For them it's people who have heard of FidoNet, but maybe not a BBS, and have no familiarity with the BBS scene.
I know you keep insisting FidoNet is and always has been a BBS network, but
"because the Policy says so," is not a good argument.
Fidonet?And that "About Joining Fidonet" page is clear: "You wanna join
We'd
rather you just go away, but if you insist go chase down this, search
for that,
and try not to bother us too much, 'K?"
Yes Nathanael, that is a total disaster!
15 years ago when I set up my BBS (which was formerly a point) I had the only system in what used to be Net 285 (Omaha NE area), but there were probably 20 systems still listed in the nodelist. I think what happened in that case is that the NC dropped out of Fidonet and didn't bother to find someone else to take over or tell anybody upstream
On line games? How can ANSI-only games compete with WoW and other modern
games?
You would be surprised.
They don't want bulletins, they want to join Fidonet.
Why? If not for the bulletins, then what?
The file areas? http://eljaco.se/FILES/
On line games? How can ANSI-only games compete with WoW and
other modern games?
Nah, I think that you and several others are on a dead end if
you try to attract new users to fidonet with 30yo BBS programs.
Sorry...
Will you please moderate yourself, and shut up and go away?
You're babbling incoherently, and don't even realize it.
Even though it is, and always has been, a BBS network.
That link opens up a Usenet client, since it's a "news:<blah>"
The odds of that person knowing how to use/navigate a
Usenet client is pretty much ZERO. Do you seriously expect them
to jump through all those hoops?
sometimes that "Addr:" field is not even labeled... it is just
another field to be filled in manually or automatically after the
software has done a nodelist lookup on the name in the "To:" field...
it should also be noted that that traditional FTN software only does
FTN addressing and doesn't have to parse and analyze the target
address to determine if it is FTN, email, QWK or some other
supported-by-that-software private system-to-system mail format...
OK, I get that there is some variation in the mechanics of things.
I think what I was meaning there above was that there could be a document/instruction that spells that kind of thing out, even give examples of how to Netmail your prospective NC with some of the
more commonly used software. A "How to Join Fidonet" document
with clear/concise directions, without extra fluff. It could be
available on any/all FidoNet BBS's, and <GASP> could even be a
regular feature in the FidoNews magazine!
I tried to help, do some good for the network, and I will continue to do so, with or without your support.
That link opens up a Usenet client, since it's a "news:<blah>"
Since it starts with "www",
I opened a browser window and typed "fidonet.io" -- full page opens
with all details as advertised.
mark lewis wrote to Dan Clough <=-
sometimes that "Addr:" field is not even labeled... it is just
another field to be filled in manually or automatically after the
software has done a nodelist lookup on the name in the "To:" field...
it should also be noted that that traditional FTN software only does
FTN addressing and doesn't have to parse and analyze the target
address to determine if it is FTN, email, QWK or some other
supported-by-that-software private system-to-system mail format...
OK, I get that there is some variation in the mechanics of things.
yeah, that was my main point... as a seasoned FTNer, i had to
learn new methods of addressing when looking at and working with
other software that does FTN is a different manner than
traditional FTN does... it was a huge eye opener... an eye opener
that some other well intentioned FTNers could use...
I think what I was meaning there above was that there could be a document/instruction that spells that kind of thing out, even give examples of how to Netmail your prospective NC with some of the
more commonly used software. A "How to Join Fidonet" document
with clear/concise directions, without extra fluff. It could be
available on any/all FidoNet BBS's, and <GASP> could even be a
regular feature in the FidoNews magazine!
i'm going to try to get my old fidonet related pages back
operational with the new server over here... it should be pretty
easy but i haven't tried yet... i don't know how they compare
with what folks are suggesting, though... i am/was quite happy
with them when i developed them but then i got sidetracked with
other things and real life... really, the only ones that needed
updating would be the links to other zones/regions/nets pages
when they change and the IC/ZC and RC lists... i think i had RC
lists but maybe not... i certainly remember the joy when i
finally got a clickable map working... that was a major PITA to
define the "click regions" of the image... especially to do it
without expending $$$ for a job that would be done only once or
maybe twice...
Terry,
Many years back I looked after the Fidonet Philippines site which I have TR>> revived for Historical purposes only since Zone 6 is gone.
If enough nodes would pop-up wonderful things might be possible ...
Are you the onlyone left or are there other folks hiding in the
woodwork ?
\%/@rd
--- D'Bridge 3.99 SR41
* Origin: Ceci n'est pas un courriel (2:292/854)
No. It's obscure and not even REMOTELY obvious to a newcomer that
they should look in there.
On top of the results from Google (for me -- YMMV) is the old,
defunct fidonet.org site. Even there it's a link to the likewise
defunct fidonews.org site. Doesn't that make you curious if you are
really into Fidonet? What better place to get information about
something than a dedicated magazine?
Even then, if they did, is there any
useful information in the magazine that would help a new
prospective Sysop get a node number?
Well, maybe you haven't read any recent (as in the latest 500 or so)
issue properly? You can for instance try fidonews.eu from where
opens up a plethora of fidonet echoes to read before you start
asking advice about how to go Full Fidonet Node.
But rather than complaining, why don't you write an article about it yourself? Don't always expect other people to do things for you...
..
--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125 * Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)
Unless of course you expect to have it all served on a silver
platter, ready to go on an .msi or .msp installer file.
And ... uh ... why not? Download, run the installer, enter your node
info and
everything comes up working. I fail to see how that would be a bad thing.
I tried to help, do some good for the network, and I will continue to do so, with or without your support.
nathanael culver wrote to Bj”rn Felten <=-
Unless of course you expect to have it all served on a silver
platter, ready to go on an .msi or .msp installer file.
And ... uh ... why not? Download, run the installer, enter your
node info and everything comes up working. I fail to see how that
would be a bad thing.
Bj”rn Felten wrote to Dan Clough <=-
No. It's obscure and not even REMOTELY obvious to a newcomer that
they should look in there.
On top of the results from Google (for me -- YMMV) is the old,
defunct fidonet.org site. Even there it's a link to the likewise
defunct fidonews.org site. Doesn't that make you curious if you
are really into Fidonet? What better place to get information
about something than a dedicated magazine?
Even then, if they did, is there any
useful information in the magazine that would help a new
prospective Sysop get a node number?
Well, maybe you haven't read any recent (as in the latest 500
or so) issue properly? You can for instance try fidonews.eu from
where opens up a plethora of fidonet echoes to read before you
start asking advice about how to go Full Fidonet Node.
But rather than complaining, why don't you write an article
about it yourself? Don't always expect other people to do things
for you...
mark lewis wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I agree with this completely. I was a Fidonet sysop back in the
early 90's, and left in 96 when I had to move and the internet was
taking over anyway. Recently came back, and although I certainly remembered the basics of how Fido works, I had some minor trouble contacting my prospective new NC because of simple things like the
proper addressing syntax of a Netmail. Is it
"first.last@<address>", or is it "first last@<address>", or.... ?
to be fair, this is specifically related to the software being
used... most traditional FTN software has separate name and
address fields...
To: some user Addr: 1:0/0
sometimes that "Addr:" field is not even labeled... it is just
another field to be filled in manually or automatically after the
software has done a nodelist lookup on the name in the "To:"
field... it should also be noted that that traditional FTN
software only does FTN addressing and doesn't have to parse and
analyze the target address to determine if it is FTN, email, QWK
or some other supported-by-that-software private system-to-system
mail format...
Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Bj”rn Felten <=-
If someone from the real world wants to find out something about
fidonet, what does he do? Look for an echo called fidonews? No,
he googles for "fidonet".
For more than two months?
A lot has changed in Fidonet, but there is one constant factor.
We still use a nodelist. So.... If I had been away for no matter
how long and wanted to return and needed to find the nearest NC,
I would google for "fidonet nodelist".
Should not take two month...
This isn't 1997 -- it's 2019. I do not have time to spend every waking free
moment looking for information in a sea of dead links. Nor do I, or anyone
else, have time to go "searching" for an elusive newsletter that might
or might
not contain information on a website that I don't even know exists.
Just for curiosity, I browsed to fidonews.eu, and
was presented with a "Login first" page. Most people won't do
that.
Re: www.fidonet.io
By: Björn Felten to Dan Clough on Sun Mar 10 2019 03:31 pm
Well, maybe you haven't read any recent (as in the latest 500 or so)
issue properly? You can for instance try fidonews.eu from where opens up a
plethora of fidonet echoes to read before you start asking advice about how
to go Full Fidonet Node.
And how in the HELL is someone who is new to Fidonet supposed to know
this and
find it?
This isn't 1997 -- it's 2019. I do not have time to spend every
waking free
moment looking for information in a sea of dead links. Nor do I, or anyone
else, have time to go "searching" for an elusive newsletter that
might or might
not contain information on a website that I don't even know exists.
I tried to help, do some good for the network,
and I will continue to do so, with or without your support.
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 69 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 05:34:34 |
Calls: | 1,162 |
Files: | 8,182 |
Messages: | 301,151 |