• Re: Fidonet => one unizo

    From Dan Clough@1:123/115 to Dale Shipp on Sat Mar 23 09:10:00 2024
    Dale Shipp wrote to Dan Clough <=-

    It would amount to what we call here in the US a "spring
    cleaning". A chance to get rid of the old cruft and useless junk
    that clutters up our houses, and our nodelists. Everybody gets a
    Zone 1 (or 2, or 3, whatever) address, and by carefully going
    through that during the re-assigning process, most (all?) of the dead/useless entries in there go away. Now, does that help the
    flow of mail work any better? Maybe not. But it's still a good
    thing. It would simplify the process of nodelist updates and distribution.

    That dead wood could also go away by the *Cs doing their jobs
    within their respective areas. Not clear why it would be done
    any better by what you propose.

    No argument from me on the *Cs doing their jobs. The reason my
    way would be better is that it would ACTUALLY GET DONE. I mean,
    how many decades are we gonna wait for the *Cs to do their jobs?

    If every member of Fidonet was in the same Zone, wouldn't that put
    a stop to the so-called "Zone Wars"? Yes, a few *C's might lose

    No, it would not. Because the zone wars are as much about
    cultural differences as they are about the zone numbers that
    label the different areas. The same disagreements would still
    happen.

    Yes, you're probably right on this. I'll concede that point.



    ... A woman drove me to drink, and I never had the courtesy to thank her.
    === MultiMail/Linux v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Linux
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)