AI actress Tilly Norwood creator claims we should judge her by merit, but my mind is already made up

Date:
Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:45:11 +0000

Description:
Studio Xicoia has created AI actor Tilly Norwood, but despite what they say, I'm concerned.

FULL STORY ======================================================================

Meet Tilly Norwood, the product of the worlds first artificial intelligence
( AI ) talent studio, Xicoia. She's got accounts all over social media, is actively looking for agent representation and studios are reportedly [via Deadline ] "circling" to get her in their movies.

Unsurprisingly, this has received a wave of backlash from Hollywood actors
and creators alike, alongside humble film and TV fans like me. Emily Blunt
has dubbed the move [via Variety ] "really scary," urging agencies "not to do that," but creator Eline Van der Velden has a different opinion.

To those who have expressed anger over the creation of my AI character, Tilly Norwood, she is not a replacement for a human being, but a creative work a piece of art, Van der Velden said at Zurich Film Festival. Like many forms of art before her, she sparks conversation, and that in itself shows the power
of creativity."

But in a world that's already charged to the point of explosion, the last
thing we need right now is more sparked conversation. Instead of being one of the best AI tools of 2025 , Norwood is one of the most unnecessary... but
it's the broader changes to the streaming landscape that I fear the most.

On her path to (hopefully) securing an agency for Norwood in the next couple
of months, Van der Velden claims she should judged as part of their own
genre, on their own merits, rather than compared directly with human actors.

But we're not talking about the likes of gorgeous hand-drawn animation by Studio Ghibli , or painstakingly crafted VFX and CGI we've seen hits like Avatar and Dune . Sure, real people have made Norwood what she is, but she'd
be acting alongside real people, on real sets, in real life.

As the X post above rightly suggests, there will likely be a big boycott from our favorite A-list names when it comes to working with Norwood... if she
even gets that far. If we're indeed judging her on merit, that means copious auditions, screen tests, rejections and extensive background work.

But that's what I'm worried about the most. If Norwood is going to succeed anywhere, it's in the streaming landscape and once she sneaks into the likes of a Netflix original movie, the floodgates are open.

It's like dominoes: once one thing becomes acceptable, so does a multitude of others. AI actors could be the gateway for complete AI productions, made by
AI crew and produced by AI sponsors. We're already seeing people experiment with this on a wider level (just look on YouTube ), but Norwood is exactly
the sort of turning point to make AI reliance commonplace.

I sound like a dystopian dictator pitting the worth of AI against humans, but
I don't want to open any of the best streaming services around to watch
content generated by a machine. The best stories are the ones that come from authentic experiences, heart, and raw vulnerability.

People are messy and so are their lives, and that just can't be replicated on the big or small screen. As Whoopi Goldberg said on The View: "You know what? Bring it on. You can always tell them from us. We move differently, our faces move differently, our bodies move differently.

We're tech people at TechRadar, so obviously we know AI has its time and
place. But I can't help thinking of that viral quote from Joanna Maciejewska when it comes to the likes of Tilly Norwood: "I want AI to do my laundry and dishes so I can do art and writing, not for AI to do my art and writing so
that I can do my laundry and dishes."

======================================================================
Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/streaming/entertainment/ai-actress-tilly-norwood-cre ator-claims-we-should-judge-her-by-merit-but-my-mind-is-already-made-up

$$
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Hello Mike!

** On Tuesday 30.09.25 - 10:05, Mike Powell wrote to All:

AI actress Tilly Norwood creator claims we should judge
her by merit, but my mind is already made up

Date:
Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:45:11 +0000

Description:
Studio Xicoia has created AI actor Tilly Norwood, but
despite what they say, I'm concerned.

FULL STORY ======================================================================

Meet Tilly Norwood, the product of the worlds first
artificial intelligence ( AI ) talent studio, Xicoia.

Perhaps much ado about nothing. Tilly Norwood is not much
different than how animation or cartoons have affected actor's
jobs. She's just the poster-child for a new creative tool.

--
../|ug

--- OpenXP 5.0.64
* Origin: (1:396/45.29)

Studio Xicoia has created AI actor Tilly Norwood, but
despite what they say, I'm concerned.

Perhaps much ado about nothing. Tilly Norwood is not much

>different than how animation or cartoons have affected actor's
>jobs. She's just the poster-child for a new creative tool.

I think it's a bit differnt when this 'animated' character looks
so real you can't tell it's not a live person.

In theory that could take a lot of less major roles away from
live actors but (one hopes) a good actor can't be replaced by
an AI manufactured 'person'..

It tends to suggest something else though, such as a way to
create real looking extreme sexual or violent content without
risking or hurting any live people. That's the sort of thing
that you can't get rid of so this is a way to maybe satisfy
a lot of the consumers of such smut without exploiting live
people or children to create it..

---
* SLMR Rob * Not a real Tagline, but an incredible simulation!
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Studio Xicoia has created AI actor Tilly Norwood, but
despite what they say, I'm concerned.

Perhaps much ado about nothing. Tilly Norwood is not much

>different than how animation or cartoons have affected actor's
>jobs. She's just the poster-child for a new creative tool.

I agree that it is at least some ado about nothing. ;) I would point out
that most cartoons do employee actors/actresses to supply the voices. Some pretty famous actors/actresses have supplied voices to many characters,
while others have found their primary line of acting work in supplying voices.

With at least some of the CGI animation work done over the years, there has
to be someone wearing the "green suit" and making the motions that the animation is later added to.

I get the impression that an AI actor/actress wouldn't require a human to supply their voice or motions for them.

Mike


* SLMR 2.1a * "Buck McCoy?!? He was bigger than opium!"
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Rob Mccart wrote to AUGUST ABOLINS <=-

It tends to suggest something else though, such as a way to
create real looking extreme sexual or violent content without
risking or hurting any live people. That's the sort of thing
that you can't get rid of so this is a way to maybe satisfy
a lot of the consumers of such smut without exploiting live
people or children to create it..

That thought's been in the back of my head for some time. Hurtful,
non-consensual urges are a part of the reptilian brain that we can't
escape. We can try to supress those feelings, for some it's a
neverending struggle. For some, the urges win out, and we have people
committing crimes against others.

Would a VR world where people could exercise their non-consensual urges
exorcise their drive to fulfill those urges in real life or motivate
them further?

We, as a society still don't know what to do with people who can't
integrate into society. We've tried incarceration, we've tried
electrochemical means of changing behavior, and I don't think it's
worked. I don't know what the answer is and I don't think that
capitalism cares.



... UNPRISON YOUR THINK RHINO
--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
* Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)

We, as a society still don't know what to do with people who can't
integrate into society. We've tried incarceration, we've tried
electrochemical means of changing behavior, and I don't think it's
worked. I don't know what the answer is and I don't think that
capitalism cares.

While I agree that incarceration *in jails* doesn't work, putting them in mental hospitals seemed to work better than what we do now... ignoring a
lot of them until it is too late... and I would like to see us go back to
that.

The fact that we don't anymore is not something I can squarely blame "capitalism" for. The original argument to stop hospitalizing came from the side of the political spectrum not usually associated with being pro- capitalism. They had a belief that it was better to try mainstreaming the mentally ill, and doing other things to try changing their behavior, instead
of keeping them locked away from the rest of society. They didn't have much support for their idea until they started using the "but it will save the government money" argument to manipulate the other side into doing what they wanted.


* SLMR 2.1a * You radiate cold shafts of broken glass!
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

It tends to suggest something else though, such as a way to
create real looking extreme sexual or violent content without
risking or hurting any live people. That's the sort of thing
that you can't get rid of so this is a way to maybe satisfy
a lot of the consumers of such smut without exploiting live
people or children to create it..

That thought's been in the back of my head for some time. Hurtful,

> non-consensual urges are a part of the reptilian brain that we can't
> escape. We can try to supress those feelings, for some it's a
> neverending struggle. For some, the urges win out, and we have people
> committing crimes against others.

Would a VR world where people could exercise their non-consensual urges

> exorcise their drive to fulfill those urges in real life or motivate
> them further?

That's an age old question, and it totally depends on the person.
I suspect people who would still go out an attack someone would
whether they had good porn available or not. The hope would be
that some afflicted people who are trying to control themselves
could use this to sit at home and satisfy their own urges and be
less likely to do something worse.. But, again, no way to know
for sure as each person is different.

We, as a society still don't know what to do with people who can't

> integrate into society. We've tried incarceration, we've tried
> electrochemical means of changing behavior, and I don't think it's
> worked. I don't know what the answer is and I don't think that
> capitalism cares.

Yes, for some only life long incarceration or a death penalty
would protect society from them. Even castration hasn't proven
to be totally effective.. you just end up with Angry perverts
who hurt people in different ways..

Not sure if indifference is a capitalism thing or a Liberal
thinking gone mad thing. It seems more and more we tend to give
all types of criminals more rights than we give to the people
they are likely to hurt or exploit.

---
* SLMR Rob * Dehydratedtagline.Justaddwaterandstir
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Not sure if indifference is a capitalism thing or a Liberal
thinking gone mad thing. It seems more and more we tend to give
all types of criminals more rights than we give to the people
they are likely to hurt or exploit.

Liberal thinking gone mad that got capitalism (conservatives) on board by pointing out it'd save money to do it their way.


* SLMR 2.1a * I can't pretend a stranger is a long-awaited friend...
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Mike Powell wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-

While I agree that incarceration *in jails* doesn't work, putting them
in mental hospitals seemed to work better than what we do now...
ignoring a lot of them until it is too late... and I would like to see
us go back to that.

When you look at mental health funding when compared to law
enforcement, it becomes apparent that we're letting people who need
serious help on the street and incarcerating them instead of treating
them. I want law prevention as well as law enforcement - fund
facilities for those people who're on the street because of mental
issues and you'll spend less on law enforcement and prisons. There are
police unions and privatized prisons that will take issue with that.

The fact that we don't anymore is not something I can squarely blame "capitalism" for. The original argument to stop hospitalizing came
from the side of the political spectrum not usually associated with
being pro- capitalism. They had a belief that it was better to try mainstreaming the mentally ill, and doing other things to try changing their behavior, instead of keeping them locked away from the rest of society. They didn't have much support for their idea until they
started using the "but it will save the government money" argument to manipulate the other side into doing what they wanted.

That's true, but when you look at the political power of police unions
and the prison system, their solution is more police and more
incarcerated.




--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
* Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)

When you look at mental health funding when compared to law
enforcement, it becomes apparent that we're letting people who need
serious help on the street and incarcerating them instead of treating
them. I want law prevention as well as law enforcement - fund
facilities for those people who're on the street because of mental
issues and you'll spend less on law enforcement and prisons. There are
police unions and privatized prisons that will take issue with that.

Not sure about the unions (since you are getting them off the street) but I agree with the privatized prisons. That should never have been allowed to happen. Things that make them money, and generate kickbacks for
politicians, are always going to come before what is good for the public
and the incarcerated.

The fact that we don't anymore is not something I can squarely blame "capitalism" for. The original argument to stop hospitalizing came
from the side of the political spectrum not usually associated with being pro- capitalism. They had a belief that it was better to try mainstreaming the mentally ill, and doing other things to try changing their behavior, instead of keeping them locked away from the rest of society. They didn't have much support for their idea until they started using the "but it will save the government money" argument to manipulate the other side into doing what they wanted.

That's true, but when you look at the political power of police unions
and the prison system, their solution is more police and more
incarcerated.

The more police are not doing a very good job of arresting them, and the prisons are not doing a very good job of keeping them incarcerated. Otherwise the problem wouldn't be "why are they on the streets?"


* SLMR 2.1a * Gimme three chili dogs and a malt.
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

We, as a society still don't know what to do with people who can't

>> integrate into society. We've tried incarceration, we've tried
>> electrochemical means of changing behavior, and I don't think it's
>> worked. I don't know what the answer is and I don't think that
>> capitalism cares.

While I agree that incarceration *in jails* doesn't work, putting them in

>mental hospitals seemed to work better than what we do now... ignoring a
>lot of them until it is too late... and I would like to see us go back to
>that.

I'm not suggesting I know what's best but I'd wonder if a mental
hospital is the best place for someone who, in theory, can't be
cured since it's part of who they are. This started off with talk
of dangerous sexual preferrences so.. Trying to 'cure' a Pedohpile
is a bit like trying to 'cure' someone of being Gay. They are what
they are and maybe can fake they are now the way you want them to
be (to get out) but you haven't really changed them.

Um.. that wasn't intended as a shot against Gay people..
I just used that because there's a history there of some trying
to 'cure'a person of being Gay..

---
* SLMR Rob * BEWARE - Tagline Thief in this echo
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Not sure if indifference is a capitalism thing or a Liberal

>> thinking gone mad thing. It seems more and more we tend to give
>> all types of criminals more rights than we give to the people
>> they are likely to hurt or exploit.

Liberal thinking gone mad that got capitalism (conservatives) on board by

>pointing out it'd save money to do it their way.

Saving money is often a big incentive, although your gov't is mostly
shit down at the moment because the more Liberal Democrats don't
want to stop the availability of health care to illegal immigrants,
if we are hearing the story accurately here in Canada.

You'd think Trump would like keeping the health care going so that
as soon as they show up for a medical thing, he could have them
deported..

---
* SLMR Rob * ---------This Tagline is blank to save space---------
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

When you look at mental health funding when compared to law

> enforcement, it becomes apparent that we're letting people who need
> serious help on the street and incarcerating them instead of treating
> them. I want law prevention as well as law enforcement - fund
> facilities for those people who're on the street because of mental
> issues and you'll spend less on law enforcement and prisons. There are
> police unions and privatized prisons that will take issue with that.

I think part of the problem with that is a lot of those people want
nothing to do with a place where they don't have complete freedom
to come and go and do whatever they want. They prefer being homeless
to having to follow rules.

Obviously you can't colour all with the same brush..

On another track, I had a thought about poor people that struck me a
while back, it costs less to put someone through College than to put
them in jail. In theory, that would mean that offering free education
to poor people would eliminate generational poverty and reduce crime
rates since they would, in theory, end up with good jobs..

Then the black cloud starts to form in the back of my mind and
I think, considering they can't get a huge percentage of those
low income people to even finish highschool, would an offer
like that do any good for more than a small percentage?

Just a random thought.. (and see 'Colour and Paint' above)..

---
* SLMR Rob * Save phosphor... Recycle your Taglines
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Mike Powell wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-

Not sure about the unions (since you are getting them off the street)
but I agree with the privatized prisons. That should never have been allowed to happen. Things that make them money, and generate kickbacks for politicians, are always going to come before what is good for the public and the incarcerated.

Agreed. Anecdotally hearing of for-profit prison companies making
thinly-veiled threats about conviction rates being too low for their
profits and contracts is antithetical to society in general.


--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
* Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)

Rob Mccart wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-

I think part of the problem with that is a lot of those people want nothing to do with a place where they don't have complete freedom
to come and go and do whatever they want. They prefer being homeless
to having to follow rules.

Yeah, it doesn't take being burned by a system many times to feel safer
on your own.

On another track, I had a thought about poor people that struck me a
while back, it costs less to put someone through College than to put
them in jail. In theory, that would mean that offering free education
to poor people would eliminate generational poverty and reduce crime
rates since they would, in theory, end up with good jobs..

It would cost even less to feed kids while they're in school and provide pre-school during the formative 1-5 years. Extend medicare to those
under 18. See what a healthy, well-fed generation does when they get
their shot.

Then the black cloud starts to form in the back of my mind and
I think, considering they can't get a huge percentage of those
low income people to even finish highschool, would an offer
like that do any good for more than a small percentage?

Just a random thought.. (and see 'Colour and Paint' above)..

---
* SLMR Rob * Save phosphor... Recycle your Taglines
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
* Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)

While I agree that incarceration *in jails* doesn't work, putting them in

>mental hospitals seemed to work better than what we do now... ignoring a
>lot of them until it is too late... and I would like to see us go back to
>that.

I'm not suggesting I know what's best but I'd wonder if a mental
hospital is the best place for someone who, in theory, can't be
cured since it's part of who they are. This started off with talk
of dangerous sexual preferrences so.. Trying to 'cure' a Pedohpile
is a bit like trying to 'cure' someone of being Gay. They are what
they are and maybe can fake they are now the way you want them to
be (to get out) but you haven't really changed them.

Anything I have said so far is in regard to dangerous/violent offenders,
and my comments were not meant to be restricted to sexual predators... from Kurt's post, I sort of read in that he was talking about all people who
have violent feelings/fantasy towards others, and not only of a sexual
nature.

If they are not offending, or showing clear signs that they will likely
offend, I don't think they need to be put anywhere. If they are offending, they need to be somewhere... jail, hospital. If they are showing
clear signs that they are likely to offend, whether that offense be rape or mass-killing, they need to be off the streets. I don't think jail is a
good place for this latter group as they've not offended yet, but we need
to stop waiting for persons "known to authorities" to offend before they
are either given help or, if the "help" doesn't help, locked away.


* SLMR 2.1a * "Cool! I broke his brain!" - Bart on Principal Skinner
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

On another track, I had a thought about poor people that struck me a
while back, it costs less to put someone through College than to put
them in jail. In theory, that would mean that offering free education
to poor people would eliminate generational poverty and reduce crime
rates since they would, in theory, end up with good jobs..

It would cost even less to feed kids while they're in school and provide

>pre-school during the formative 1-5 years. Extend medicare to those
>under 18. See what a healthy, well-fed generation does when they get
>their shot.

I guess it's one of those things where you'd not know what would
happen until you tried it. Will it make them want to succeed or
just produce a well fed new batch of criminals?

It's not this way anymore but, at one time in Canada, they made a
point of not putting all the poor people on welfare in the same
area, they would pay more and mix them with middle class people
in the hopes that the often single mothers with children would
grow up looking for something better. I imagine that worked to
some extent but eventually the poor people number so high that
something like that isn't workable..

---
* SLMR Rob * Actual tagline may vary from illustration
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

If they are not offending, or showing clear signs that they will likely

>offend, I don't think they need to be put anywhere. If they are offending,
>they need to be somewhere... jail, hospital. If they are showing
>clear signs that they are likely to offend, whether that offense be rape or
>mass-killing, they need to be off the streets. I don't think jail is a
>good place for this latter group as they've not offended yet, but we need
>to stop waiting for persons "known to authorities" to offend before they
>are either given help or, if the "help" doesn't help, locked away.

It's a tough call, when you just know someone is a time bomb to
hurting or killing others but they haven't done so yet.

Possibly they would benefit from some psychiatric care, which
they would probably have to be forced into, and have the professionals
decide if/when they become safe to let loose on the streets..

---
* SLMR Rob * This is a Tagline mirror>|<rorrim enilgaT a si sihT
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

It's a tough call, when you just know someone is a time bomb to
hurting or killing others but they haven't done so yet.

Possibly they would benefit from some psychiatric care, which
they would probably have to be forced into, and have the professionals
decide if/when they become safe to let loose on the streets..

Which is what I think they used to do.

Mike


* SLMR 2.1a * "Einstein? Who's he? Another troublemaker?" - H.Baines
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Rob Mccart wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-

I guess it's one of those things where you'd not know what would
happen until you tried it. Will it make them want to succeed or
just produce a well fed new batch of criminals?

Science says you're going to raise smarter kids with better mental
health and a better chance at success than kids left hungry without
positive influences.

There's a spectrum of people out there - some have dreams of a better
life, others may not. Providing nutrition and care to kids when they're
at their peak of development will help the former, and certainly
wouldn't harm the latter.




--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
* Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)

It's a tough call, when you just know someone is a time bomb to

>> hurting or killing others but they haven't done so yet.

Possibly they would benefit from some psychiatric care, which

>> they would probably have to be forced into, and have the professionals
>> decide if/when they become safe to let loose on the streets..

Which is what I think they used to do.

Yes, probably.. but that is likely a lot more costly and we know
where that leads..

---
* SLMR Rob * Hey, this isn't my Tagline! - Who put this here?
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

I guess it's one of those things where you'd not know what would
happen until you tried it. Will it make them want to succeed or
just produce a well fed new batch of criminals?

Science says you're going to raise smarter kids with better mental

> health and a better chance at success than kids left hungry without
> positive influences.

There's a spectrum of people out there - some have dreams of a better

> life, others may not. Providing nutrition and care to kids when they're
> at their peak of development will help the former, and certainly
> wouldn't harm the latter.

One would hope so.. I think there's a major problem when kids are
growing up in a very poor income area where, even if they are
better looked after than others, there will still be peer pressure
to be like everyone around you or you get beat up at school a lot.

But I don't know if people removed from that hear the true story.
You seem to always see on TV shows and such that even the good kids
are being forced to join gangs and sell drugs and such and most
dropping out of school long before they could even think about any
higher education.

Plus you get the impression that a lot of these kids don't have
a father at home and a mother working 3 jobs to keep food on
the table so no one around to keep an eye on what the kids are
doing after school, or if they are even going to school.

There's no question, if you can break a kid out of that situation
there's an excellent chance that his children will then be more
likely to do well too and you end up with generational prosperity
rather than poverty.

I won't pretend to know this stuff inside out but my parents
worked harder and got better educations, getting degrees in
night school while working, and they ended up pretty well off
where most of their siblings did not. Those siblings are very
vocal about how our prosperity was because we were just lucky.

Move forward 50 years and we have 2 more generations and
all are fairly well off. Every generation usually does better
than the previous one *if they taught that hard work = success*..

I added that last part because I recently read that people
who inherit huge amounts of money, over 60% of them are often
bankrupt within 2 generations and that rises to 90% within
3 generations. This is the problem with just handing people
money that they didn't have to work hard to earn..

---
* SLMR Rob * I erased the good Tagline before you could read it
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Ha.. Not quite the same thing but I remember when I was about 12
taking on cutting the grass at home for an extra 75 cents a week
on my allowance.. This was on a small hobby farm we had with close
to an acre of grass around the house to cut with a push mower.

Push as in a gas engine mower but not a riding tractor/mower.

I remember cutting my grandfathers small lawn using a true push
mower that had no engine, the spiral blades spun as you pushed it.

I didn't want to confuse it with that type.. B)

I always considered "push" to mean the ones with an engine that you had to stand behind and push, and "reel" to mean the ones with no engine. I own
both. I have never owned or used a riding mower.

I bought the reel mower after I got my first house. It had a fairly small front yard. I liked being able to mow the grass without breathing in the exhaust. It would work on the backyard, too, but was more difficult to use there because the terrain was not smooth... I suspect there was not much
dirt on top of rock (a few of which stuck out of the ground).

For that front yard, provided I was able to stay on top of it and not let the weeds get too tall, it was less work using the reel mower than the
gas-powered one.

Mike

* SLMR 2.1a * We all live in a yellow subroutine.
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)