On 16 Jun 2022, Aaron Thomas said the following...
In other words, you're looking for somewhere that your aseless theori and allegations won't be challenged.
No, I'm looking for a place where people can talk politics a bit without being dicks, where people can appreciate each other's differing opinions.
Your "differing opinion," of course, being baseless theories and allegations, sometimes using "psychics" and your "imagination" as sources. And you want those appreciated but not challenged.
It's rude to tell people to
prove what they're saying.
No, it's not.
If a Burger King employee tells me "We're out of onion rings," I'm not going to say "Take me to the walk-in freezer so I can confirm that
you're not lying." Which body part would I be akin to if I said
something like that?
That's not an accurate comparison. If you somehow knew for certain that the employee was lying, or if the employee said that the reason they had no onion rings was because a herd of unicorns stampeded through the restaurant and ate them all, you might ask for clarification.
I'm not down with it. And links to webpages
don't prove anything either, other than the fact that someone or organization published it.
They can, if the link contains facts and data disproving your baseles theory or accusation.
A web page is as capable of containing facts as I am at doing the dishes.
That's why you must consider the source of the data on the web page. For example, if the webpage is citing "psychics" and its author's "imagination"
as sources, then it's probably not legit.
Jeff.
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)