Are people likely to want different message base formats within the same network? Or would it be ok for a user to be able to specify that he wants to use JAM or SQ3 for ALL the areas in that network.
Are people likely to want different message base formats within the same network? Or would it be ok for a user to be able to specify that he wants to use JAM or SQ3 for ALL the areas in that network.
On 21-Dec-2018 22:28, apam wrote to All <=-
Hi
So I'm wondering about the qwknet and Maginet tools in magicka.
The config files as they are don't lend themselves to configuring
specific types of message base per area. I could easily configure a
format for all the areas, but to do so on a per area basis would
require a bit of reworking of the config files.
Are people likely to want different message base formats within the
same network? Or would it be ok for a user to be able to specify that
he wants to use JAM or SQ3 for ALL the areas in that network.
Quoting apam to All <=-
Are people likely to want different message base formats within the
same network? Or would it be ok for a user to be able to specify that
he wants to use JAM or SQ3 for ALL the areas in that network.
Are people likely to want different message base formats within the
same network? Or would it be ok for a user to be able to specify that
he wants to use JAM or SQ3 for ALL the areas in that network.
Are people likely to want different message base formats within t
same network? Or would it be ok for a user to be able to specify
he wants to use JAM or SQ3 for ALL the areas in that network.
Aside from testing the new, and maybe adapting it later, I actually
can't see any benefit to running multiple msg base types on the same
BBS. I may not be savvy enough to, though. :)
Quoting apam to All <=-
Are people likely to want different message base formats within t
same network? Or would it be ok for a user to be able to specify
No. At least I sure wouldn't.
he wants to use JAM or SQ3 for ALL the areas in that network.
This would work.
On 22-Dec-2018 10:35, Tiny wrote to apam <=-
he wants to use JAM or SQ3 for ALL the areas in that network.
This would work.
... Women are like programs. A smart man keeps a backup. :)
On 22-Dec-2018 03:50, Blue White wrote to apam <=-
Are people likely to want different message base formats within the
same network? Or would it be ok for a user to be able to specify that
he wants to use JAM or SQ3 for ALL the areas in that network.
Aside from testing the new, and maybe adapting it later, I actually
can't see any benefit to running multiple msg base types on the same
BBS. I may not be savvy enough to, though. :)
On 22-Dec-2018 21:57, apam wrote to Blue White <=-
I still have to add Maginet support, and that wont likely get done for
a while as my family are arriving today from interstate to spend some
time for christmas, so will not likely be doing any programming :)
And therein lies a question for apam - would it be possible to have a migration utility, so I could migrate existing areas from JAM to anoth supported format.
On 22-Dec-2018 21:57, apam wrote to Blue White <=-
I still have to add Maginet support, and that wont likely get don
a while as my family are arriving today from interstate to spend
time for christmas, so will not likely be doing any programming :
Take your time, you've done some great work on Magicka. You deserve
some time off to do the Christmas stuff. Enjoy! :)
Quoting apam to Tiny <=-
Yep, I went for that with QWKnet, magimail you can specify SQ3 for individual message bases, but qwk net you can't and maginet you wont
be able to.
Quoting apam to vk3jed <=-
It's fixed now :)
apam wrote to Blue White <=-
I still have to add Maginet support, and that wont likely get done for
a while as my family are arriving today from interstate to spend some
time for christmas, so will not likely be doing any programming :)
apam wrote to Blue White <=-
I still have to add Maginet support, and that wont likely get don
a while as my family are arriving today from interstate to spend
time for christmas, so will not likely be doing any programming :
Merry Christmas!
On 23-Dec-2018 00:06, Tiny wrote to apam <=-
Quoting apam to vk3jed <=-
It's fixed now :)
That's always the way! I remember showing off my email client back
in the
day and it would /always/ fail when I was showing my mother or a
friend in
person who knew what it was. ;)
On 23-Dec-2018 08:13, apam wrote to vk3jed <=-
Hehe thanks will do. Though I just found a bug while showing the fat sandwich to my brother in law (You know I made this bbs package and
this is how you send an email with the console, now we can read the
email on the web.... 404. oops.)
It's fixed now :)
On 23-Dec-2018 07:51, apam wrote to vk3jed <=-
And therein lies a question for apam - would it be possible to have a migration utility, so I could migrate existing areas from JAM to anoth supported format.
Yeah it would be a good thing to have.
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 57 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 18:33:29 |
Calls: | 513 |
Files: | 6,922 |
Messages: | 286,019 |