On 16-Dec-2018 03:32, apam wrote to All <=-
The main reason why, is I want to support message bases other than JAM. Jam is very nice, and if all goes according to plan you won't notice anything... however, I'd like to also support SMB (synchronet message bases) possibly even reincarnate my SQlite message bases, or even MySQL message bases - what could you do with PHP and mysql (Who knows?!)
Quoting apam to All <=-
notice anything... however, I'd like to also support SMB (synchronet message bases) possibly even reincarnate my SQlite message bases, or
even MySQL message bases - what could you do with PHP and mysql (Who
(I know I should probably make a branch... but where's the fun in
that?!)
The main reason why, is I want to support message bases other than JAM.
however, I'd like to also support SMB (synchronet message
bases) possibly even reincarnate my SQlite message bases, or even MySQL message bases - what could you do with PHP and mysql (Who knows?!)
apam wrote to All <=-
So yeah, update now if you have been putting it off, will give you the latest before the crazyness. I intend on testing it on the fat
sandwich, and will let you know when the git repo has settled down.
apam wrote to All <=-
So yeah, update now if you have been putting it off, will give yo latest before the crazyness. I intend on testing it on the fat sandwich, and will let you know when the git repo has settled dow
Done, hope I pulled it in time. :D
Quoting apam to All <=-
notice anything... however, I'd like to also support SMB (synchro message bases) possibly even reincarnate my SQlite message bases,
even MySQL message bases - what could you do with PHP and mysql (
Both SMB and SQL would be far better then JAM that's for sure. JAM
is a old outdated thing. I've been promoting moving away from it for years, but I'm always shot down because "Standards".
You know I'm down for testing!
You should make a branch... jsut in case you get to a point where
"Oh shit, I need to start over"
The main reason why, is I want to support message bases other than JAM. Jam is very nice, and if all goes according to plan you won't notice anything... however, I'd like to also support SMB (synchronet message bases) possibly even reincarnate my SQlite message bases, or even MySQL message bases - what could you do with PHP and mysql (Who knows?!)
(I know I should probably make a branch... but where's the fun in that?!)
On 16-Dec-2018 01:34, Satchmo wrote to apam <=-
On 12/15/18, apam said the following...
however, I'd like to also support SMB (synchronet message
bases) possibly even reincarnate my SQlite message bases, or even MySQL message bases - what could you do with PHP and mysql (Who knows?!)
Andrew, would love to see SQlite or MySQL message bases or in fact most other data. This would be huge plus for me.
On 15-Dec-2018 15:49, Al wrote to apam <=-
Re: Out the window
By: apam to All on Sat Dec 15 2018 04:32 pm
The main reason why, is I want to support message bases other than JAM.
Have you ever thought of adding Squish message base support? The reason
I ask is because I have a collection of Squish message bases across different nets that I could plug into Magicka, that I have HPT plugging away on.
The main reason I like squish is that you can delete messages and they
go away without the need to pack your message base. I like that in
netmail areas. Say I have 5 netmail messages, delete number 2 and 4,
now I have three netmail messages. In a jam base I still have 5 until I pack the message base.
On 15-Dec-2018 22:50, Tiny wrote to apam <=-
Both SMB and SQL would be far better then JAM that's for sure. JAM
is a
old outdated thing. I've been promoting moving away from it for
years,
but I'm always shot down because "Standards".
You know I'm down for testing!
(I know I should probably make a branch... but where's the fun in
that?!)
You should make a branch... jsut in case you get to a point where "Oh
shit, I need to start over"
will Magicka still support JAM, and how do the other formats go with machines with limited ram (128Mb) and cpu power?
(I know I should probably make a branch... but where's the fun in
Please make a branch, so it doesn't break the current system. #-)
I don't see why Squish couldn't be added. And if the abstraction is done right, it may even be possible to have third party message store "plugins", which would take the load off Andrew for maintaining different message stores.
I don't delete netmails. :D
Re: Re: Out the window
By: vk3jed to Al on Sat Dec 15 2018 09:24 pm
I don't see why Squish couldn't be added. And if the abstraction right, it may even be possible to have third party message store "plugins", which would take the load off Andrew for maintaining d message stores.
Yeah, looking back I have always relied on squish. Looking forward I
think SMB is the way to go but I suppose that is all debateable. :)
On 16-Dec-2018 04:37, Al wrote to vk3jed <=-
Yeah, looking back I have always relied on squish. Looking forward I
think SMB is the way to go but I suppose that is all debateable. :)
I don't delete netmails. :D
I delete them unless they contain info I'll be looking for at a later date, and if that's the case I usually save them to a file.
Quoting apam to Tiny <=-
Haha yeah. I did end up making a branch.
Quoting vk3jed to Tiny <=-
If the old fossils (not to be confused with FOSSILs) get their way, we well use the Hudson messagebase or *.MSG as the "standard". :D I've
blown up enough Hudson messagebases to know how severe its limitations are. :D
On 12-16-18 12:33, Tiny wrote to vk3jed <=-
If the old fossils (not to be confused with FOSSILs) get their way, we well use the Hudson messagebase or *.MSG as the "standard". :D I've
Anything other then *.MSG is useless. ;)
blown up enough Hudson messagebases to know how severe its limitations are. :D
You and me both. ... I had a hack using multi copies of RA for different
networks... I can't remember what I did but it was a hot mess.
will Magicka still support JAM, and how do the other formats go with machines with limited ram (128Mb) and cpu power?
Yes, it will continue to support JAM, in fact JAM is the default, so in theory you should not notice any changes if you want to use JAM.
Considering how old the old girl is, it's amazing it's still going. Try that with some of today's newer pc's. @0(
Considering how old the old girl is, it's amazing it's still going. Try that with some of today's newer pc's. @0(
What kind of PC is it?
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 60 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 03:36:52 |
Calls: | 516 |
Files: | 6,989 |
Messages: | 288,250 |