Below is my reply to your message. It's *not encrypted* only signed
(but not clearsigned). Anyone with gpg can decode it and view it's
contents
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
owGbwMvMwMRovbl2hdf0ydqMaxlNk7jS83NSUlP0covT48Qnf/DIVHAsTS8tLtHh
4vLPUzAyMDLQNTDUNbBUMDKyMja3MjDVUajML1UoL8ovSVUoyVfITbXi4lKws1Nw
Below is my reply to your message. It's *not encrypted* only signed
(but not clearsigned). Anyone with gpg can decode it and view it's
contents
[snip]
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
owGbwMvMwMRovbl2hdf0ydqMaxlNk7jS83NSUlP0covT48Qnf/DIVHAsTS8tLtHh
4vLPUzAyMDLQNTDUNbBUMDKyMja3MjDVUajML1UoL8ovSVUoyVfITbXi4lKws1Nw
An "only signed" message produces what still looks encrypted.
Maybe we are being too loose with the terminology.
Maybe we should say, just signing a message *encodes* it.
Maybe we should say, just signing a message *encodes* it.
I'm already trying to do that. "Ascii encoding" is not the same
as "Encrypting"!
| Sysop: | altere |
|---|---|
| Location: | Houston, TX |
| Users: | 71 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 09:39:28 |
| Calls: | 1,638 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 8,774 |
| D/L today: |
2 files (24K bytes) |
| Messages: | 309,594 |