1. Forum
  2. FidoNet
  3. PUBLIC KEYS

  • Re: Key update w/photo

    From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to August Abolins on Tue Jan 7 10:26:02 2020
    *** Answering a msg posted in area PKEY_DROP.

    [I'm replying here, because the above area isn't for discussion]

    Hi August,

    On 2020-01-07 03:00:53, you wrote to me:

    I am "replying" to the specific encrypted message (to keep the thread link) ..but TB does not permit encrypted replies. :(

    It doesn't?

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to August Abolins on Tue Jan 7 10:34:48 2020
    *** Answering a msg posted in area PKEY_DROP.

    Hi August,

    On 2020-01-06 20:23:00, you wrote to me:

    -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
    Charset: ISO-8859-1
    Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

    [Partly decoded and quoted ;)]

    I was unable to send an encrypted reply between us in echomail.

    Yes you were!? But you didn't sign this message...

    BTW, If it *did* work, I wonder if that would be a violation of the
    echo rules. :(

    Yes, but I think a onetime experiment should be ok.

    Personally, I think this is neat (in echomail) but if anyone else were
    to get no access to encrypted messages in echomail, being the messages
    are just between a just a few people, then it may as well be via
    email, and not be copied/echoed to multiple fidonet systems.

    It defeats the purpose of echomail, so besides some experimentation, you should
    send encrypted echomail...

    But thanks for proving that it can be done. I am not sure if I can duplicate success with another editor.

    You just did with @PID: OpenXP/5.0.42 (Win32). ;)


    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From Tommi Koivula@2:221/360 to Wilfred van Velzen on Tue Jan 7 14:17:34 2020
    Hi Wilfred.

    07 Jan 20 10:26:02, you wrote to August Abolins:

    but TB does not permit encrypted replies. :(

    It doesn't?

    No, because it doesn't permit encrypted messages to newsgroups (nntp server). Which is quite ok.

    'Tommi

    ---
    * Origin: - rbb.fidonet.fi - Finland - (2:221/360)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Tommi Koivula on Tue Jan 7 13:37:04 2020
    Hi Tommi,

    On 2020-01-07 14:17:34, you wrote to me:

    but TB does not permit encrypted replies. :(

    It doesn't?

    No, because it doesn't permit encrypted messages to newsgroups (nntp server). Which is quite ok.

    I can see the logic behind that. ;)

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)