Back in November, the Trump administration discussed the possibility
of sending $2000 to each American taxpayer this summer, with money
saved from the administration's reciprocal tariffs.
However, Democrats don't want Americans to enjoy the benefit of having
a president who stands up for them. Furthermore, they don't want us to
be thankful to the Trump administration for a pile of cash in our
hands.
So they do what's logical: they get their monkeys to demand that the
money be given back to the foreign corporations (some state-owned)
that it was extracted from, while we continue to pay the prices that result from the tariffs that they impose on us.
(Thanks a lot Democrats)
So they do what's logical: they get their monkeys to demand that the money be given back to the foreign corporations (some state-owned) that it was extracted from, while we continue to pay the prices that result from the tariffs that they impose on us.
(Thanks a lot Democrats)
I see, even after all this time, that you still have no idea how
tarrifs work.
The US gov collected more than 200 billion dollars from tariffs. It didn't cost me a penny. It hurt foreign corporations the most and now Obama's sons want to compensate them for it.It is ironic that Democrats are even againt using the funds to help pay for the extended ACA subsidies.
The US gov collected more than 200 billion dollars from tariffs. It d cost me a penny. It hurt foreign corporations the most and now Obama' sons want to compensate them for it.It is ironic that Democrats are even againt using the funds to help pay for the extended ACA subsidies.
Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-
So they do what's logical: they get their monkeys to demand that the
money be given back to the foreign corporations (some state-owned) that
it was extracted from, while we continue to pay the prices that result from the tariffs that they impose on us.
(Thanks a lot Democrats)
The US gov collected more than 200 billion dollars from tariffs. It didn't cost me a penny. It hurt foreign corporations the most and now Obama's
sons want to compensate them for it.
So they do what's logical: they get their monkeys to demand that the money be given back to the foreign corporations (some state-owned) th it was extracted from, while we continue to pay the prices that resul from the tariffs that they impose on us.
(Thanks a lot Democrats)
The Democrats have long shown that they are the Enemy of the People.
IHMO: The money should go to paying off the national debt.
The US gov collected more than 200 billion dollars from tariffs. It di cost me a penny. It hurt foreign corporations the most and now Obama's sons want to compensate them for it.
The cost of the tarrifs was not paid by the foreign manufactures and was passed down to US consumers.
The only way tarrifs would not affect US consumers is if US
manufacturing was ready to step in an produce the same products here on
US soil, which it has not bee able to do since the late 1980's. It
would take several decades for US manufactuing to move that capability back to the USA, and even then the cost of labor alone would be prohibitive.
This doesn't even touch the fact that SCOTUS deemed the tariffs illegal.
This doesn't even touch the fact that SCOTUS deemed the tariffs illegal.
On 09 Mar 2026, Brent Hendricks said the following...
This doesn't even touch the fact that SCOTUS deemed the tariffsillegal.
In the manner he did it... The SCOTUS in their decision was sooooooooo narrow it gave him other ways to do the same thing.
Tariffs are still going and if Trump has his way he'll cut income tax for those under 200K.
Tariffs were the only way the US collected money prior to 1913 with the 16th Amendment added to the books.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
That's the most responsible thing to do, but look at the concept that Trump could create for voters: "MAGA politicians put $2000 in my
pocket."
Plus it has the potential to make them start to think "F other
countries, I like Trump, I like tariffs, I like $2000, and I like
America First."
Not like we need more votes, but the more the merrier.
We need more votes now to counter the fake/illegal votes that the Democrats create.
I just saw Chuck Schumer admit that 20 million illegals voted in the last election.
Well we almost agree on something.
"In the manner he did it.."
Under the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 8), Congress holds the primary power to lay and collect tariffs, duties, and imposts"
The executive branch doesn't have the authority to levy tarrifs. FULL STOP.
It wasn't SCOTUS that narrowly interpreted it, it is one of the places
the constitution is incedibly narrow, and unfortunately anotehr area congress has largely abdicated it's authority, removing checks and balances.
LOL, sure just like. DOGE Checks $5,000 (He claims he didn't say it, but we all know he mouthpieces don't speak without his blessing, and he endorsed it on national television. When in fact it was never seriously proposed to congress by the administration. Lower price of groceries, lower energy prices.
Not only do all of the experts say this is impossible due to bad math,
but Trump himself doesn't even rememeber making the promise of rebate checks, "I did do that? When did I do that?"
Gee any why did we do that? Because tariffs weren't an adequate income source, because the importation of goods actually limmits the money
those goods can generate, and it unduely burdens the consumers, while bennifiting those with wealth..
Believing anything that comes out of the Trump administration at this point is like beliving that the narcacist you are in a relationship with is willing to change.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
I just saw Chuck Schumer admit that 20 million illegals voted in the last election.
That's weird that he admitted to it. Is he proud of himself? lol
IB Joe wrote to Brent Hendricks <=-
Cut him some slack.
All of the experts??
What you just said was not true... Tariff income prior to 1913 was sufficient, more than enough. There were Blue Ribbon groups setup on
how to spend the excess.
We don't have a income problem in the US we have a spending problem.
I'm for small government. I'm for way less spending. WAY WAY LESS.
Trump says he can balance the budget after he exposes all the fraud.
Gee any why did we do that? Because tariffs weren't an adequate income source, because the importation of goods actually limmits the money
those goods can generate, and it unduely burdens the consumers, while bennifiting those with wealth..
The Rat has TDS, so he can't cut Trump any slack.
All the ones he knows. You know, the experts who are out, standing in their fields.
History is not a TDS sufferer's strong point.
I think there's a good chance of that. Heck, after the fraud is gone, I think we will end up not paying federal taxes either.
| Sysop: | altere |
|---|---|
| Location: | Houston, TX |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 03:23:13 |
| Calls: | 1,837 |
| Files: | 9,073 |
| Messages: | 315,538 |