Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-
While watching the bill get higher and higher, the whole time I've wondered "Do Democrats allow utility companies to rip us off?" Because
it sure seems like it.
So, one year, the water fee went up a great deal. When the announcement was made (and it was made a few months BEFORE the fee went up), we were told that the city was charging us more and the association was passing
on those increases to us. They even included the calculations to show
how each unit went up, announcement from the city, etc.
It was amazing how many people were mad at the association because
someone else raised the cost of water.
I do not believe he, or Kamala, are "chosen by God." Beliefs like that when it comes to someone in politics will get you in a lot of trouble.
Relying on a candidate being chosen by God would be a mistake, because we've got to do a lot more than just chant slogans.
Praying for Trump's victory is the way to go. I do it every day, sometimes twice a day.
You brought up cutting power bills in half. That sounds pretty pie in the sky that, I am guessing, could become true for some. I don't think he can promise that to everyone and have it work out, though, without a really good plan.
Has your bill gone up drastically since Biden became president? I've been watching mine climb, and I just paid a very ridiculous bill of $267 for August
which is more than double what it was last year. I used to only get bills this
high in the winter, and only in the coldest months like January and February.
While watching the bill get higher and higher, the whole time I've wondered "D
Democrats allow utility companies to rip us off?" Because it sure seems like it.
I am on the fence about taxing OT. I think that should depend on how much money you make overall. I have worked places where people are not making much and are working their tails off. I have also worked places where people are making plenty but are intentionally pissing about during their alloted 40 hours so they winding up earning OT (and causing others who don't want it to get some, too). They should be taxed as they are now.
It's kind of a gimmick, but not necessarily a bad one. And definitely not a gimmick that causes division.
I suspect that all of these things he is suggesting regarding "no tax on"
will not really pan out the way people think, though. The President won't have any control over what states do, and I am sure most of them will continue taxing whatever they are taxing now.
He's got to be talking just about Federal income tax. That will be a bigger amount than the state tax anyway (in most states at least.) So having that extra income not subject to Federal income tax sounds like something we could all probably live with.
She probably knew what he was saying, regardless of which state, has been
debunked and that only die-hard never-gonna-vote-Harris people would
Right - she probably knew that he was referring to Virginia, but I think she would have looked (kinda) smart if she corrected him on that. Then she could have went on to correct him for inaccurately describing the abortion law itself, but she failed. She doesn't actually know that facts any better than Trump does.
Stuff like that is why I don't get what anyone means when they say "Kamala did
good."
Most of it. She wasn't word-salading for the most part. Now, she completely ignored some questions for sure, but she was coherent.
That's more like it. She evaded questions. ("Is the USA better now than it was
4 years ago?") But how can you call that "coherent?" Because she evaded the questions in a coherent way?
The president gets more blame than they deserve, probably. However, what cause
electric bills to double in price? If it's because of oil prices, then that's the president's fault.
If it's because of labor disputes, then that's the
president's fault too.
We need our president to act like our manager, and our
stuff is not being managed well.
While watching the bill get higher and higher, the whole time I've wonde "D
Democrats allow utility companies to rip us off?" Because it sure seems it.
No, but they do other things that make the cost of electricity for the companies higher. Also, some of the big companies (who sell to the smaller ones like we have here) probably are donating to one side or the other.
She got him off on tangents where he ranted about already-debunked or now-debunked situations at least twice, which played well to her supporters.
The fact that she did better than Biden probably made a lot of her supporters think she did "good."
The president gets more blame than they deserve, probably. However, what cause
electric bills to double in price? If it's because of oil prices, then t the president's fault.
It is only the President's fault if his/her policies caused the price to go up.
If it's because of labor disputes, then that's the
president's fault too.
No in most cases it is not.
Has your bill gone up drastically since Biden became president? I've been watching mine climb, and I just paid a very ridiculous bill of $267 for August, which is more than double what it was last year. I used to only get bills this high in the winter, and only in the coldest months like January and February.
While watching the bill get higher and higher, the whole time I've wondered "Do Democrats allow utility companies to rip us off?" Because
it sure seems like it.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
The president gets more blame than they deserve, probably. However,
what causes electric bills to double in price? If it's because of oil prices, then that's the president's fault. If it's because of labor disputes, then that's the president's fault too. We need our president
to act like our manager, and our stuff is not being managed well.
While watching the bill get higher and higher, the whole time I've wond
"D
Democrats allow utility companies to rip us off?" Because it sure seems
it.
No, but they do other things that make the cost of electricity for the companies higher. Also, some of the big companies (who sell to the smaller ones like we have here) probably are donating to one side or the other.
That was also part of my fear, that the extra money was being used against me. Apparently my fears aren't as irrational as I thought.
She got him off on tangents where he ranted about already-debunked or now-debunked situations at least twice, which played well to her supporters.
I don't remember Trump repeating debunked claims, but debunking is a word that
means a lot of different things to lots of different people. For example, my friend Alan thinks that debunking means reading typed words on websites. Do yo
remember when nobody ever used the word "debunk?" It was like 9 years ago.
The fact that she did better than Biden probably made a lot of her supporters think she did "good."
That's probably true. They are told what to believe, and the media has been telling everyone that she did good.
The president gets more blame than they deserve, probably. However, wha
cause
electric bills to double in price? If it's because of oil prices, then the president's fault.
It is only the President's fault if his/her policies caused the price to go up.
What about us needing a president who will be our rock?
If it's because of labor disputes, then that's the
president's fault too.
No in most cases it is not.
He or she needs to be on top of those things instead of taking a beach vacation. They need to solve problems before they become problems - that's effective management.
Part of this is inflation as well, which is an issue that infuriates me to no end to hear being tossed at the feet of the current administration. Quantitative Easing was Trump's big play in 2019 and 2020.
The result was pumping out something along the lines of a 40% increase of pape
money in circulation. That, combined with the already escalating GLOBAL inflation issue, means that Trump and the Fed should be holding the bag on the
current inflation issue. That this isn't a major point of discussion is disgusting.
That was also part of my fear, that the extra money was being used again me. Apparently my fears aren't as irrational as I thought.
Note that I said "probably" as I have no proof. There is a big gas and electric company on the West Coast that gets in trouble a lot but then seems to wiggle out of it, and it is a common belief that they are doing so by above-or-under-the-table donations.
If a company is really smart, they probably "butter both sides of the bread" and donate to both parties.
Part of this is inflation as well, which is an issue that infuriates me end to hear being tossed at the feet of the current administration. Quantitative Easing was Trump's big play in 2019 and 2020.
The result was pumping out something along the lines of a 40% increase o pape
money in circulation. That, combined with the already escalating GLOBAL inflation issue, means that Trump and the Fed should be holding the bag the
current inflation issue. That this isn't a major point of discussion is disgusting.
My understanding is that the current administration did continue printing money, when they could have reversed the policy, so they are not
innocent in this.
Trump mentioned that Virginia was pushing for infanticide, which was already debunked, and repeatedly brought up the Springfield pet-eating claim, which has since been debunked.
Trump mentioned that Virginia was pushing for infanticide, which was already debunked, and repeatedly brought up the Springfield pet-eating claim, which has since been debunked.
My understanding is that the current administration did continue printing money, when they could have reversed the policy, so they are not
innocent in this.
The current administration's print order was primarily for the bank bailout, which might even be worse from a policy standpoint.
Trump mentioned that Virginia was pushing for infanticide, which was already debunked, and repeatedly brought up the Springfield pet-eating claim, which has since been debunked.
How is it debunked? Didn't they agree that they were not going to
perform lifesaving treatment on abortion survivors, but that they would keep it comfortable until it died? Technically that's not infanticide,
but it's still neglect, abuse, and homicide. And if that's what Trump is talking about, then I agree with him.
Trump mentioned that Virginia was pushing for infanticide, which was already debunked, and repeatedly brought up the Springfield pet-eating claim, which has since been debunked.
Debunked how? There were also reports of migrants killing livestock back in 2021 when Biden first ripped the border open. This doesn't mean that all the migrants are doing it, but it could mean that it's happened before.
How is it debunked? Didn't they agree that they were not going to perform lifesaving treatment on abortion survivors, but that they would it comfortable until it died? Technically that's not infanticide,
but it's still neglect, abuse, and homicide. And if that's what Trump is talking about, then I agree with him.
No, he was talking about babies who are not born viable there. That
I asked this before but, if a birth is not viable (i.e. the kid will not live no matter what you do), I am not sure what people who are supposedly all about babies get so upset about wanting to keep a dying infant comfortable.
The alleged examples used in Internet memes... the cat eater who is actually a US citizen who doesn't live in Springfield, and the goose killer which also didn't happen in Springfield... have been debunked by local newspapers. I posted such a link to an article from the Canton newspaper that said straight up the person who killed the cat was a
known citizen with mental issues, and the incident happened in their
town, not Springfield.
Babies that are not viable are babies that are not expected to survive, so they're not going to provide lifesaving treatment to them. To me, that's homicide. That's not what they were discussing, but I'm glad it was brought
We want more to be done to help the infant instead of just giving up. When a patient or their family feels that the doctor at one hospital isn't trying har
enough to save their loved one, many people seek a 2nd opinion and/or a transfer to a different hospital. Also, if the abortion method performed was the cause of the live birth of a non viable fetus, then that method of abortio
needs to be banned.
The alleged examples used in Internet memes... the cat eater who is actually a US citizen who doesn't live in Springfield, and the goose killer which also didn't happen in Springfield... have been debunked by local newspapers. I posted such a link to an article from the Canton newspaper that said straight up the person who killed the cat was a known citizen with mental issues, and the incident happened in their town, not Springfield.
Trump might have chose a bad example to relate to dealing with migrants, but like you said, there are a lot of other migrant-related issues that can be tackled by bringing back Trump's border policies.
Do you think taking a dying adult off life support is also murder,
because that is what this is, just with a baby instead of an adult.
I tire of this discussion as it is obvious it is going to either
continue down the same path of no matter what evidence is provided, or
get resolved only to pop back up the next time Trump or Vance or some other MAGA mouthpiece re-presents it as something that really happened.
Sysop: | altere |
---|---|
Location: | Houston, TX |
Users: | 69 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 05:20:02 |
Calls: | 1,403 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 8,542 |
Messages: | 308,765 |