1. Forum
  2. FidoNet
  3. FUTURE4FIDO

  • Ideas....

    From Matt Munson@1:218/109 to All on Thu Nov 25 11:05:29 2021
    Would reducing the backbone.na and merging some of the echoes into 1 might be one idea to simplify fidonet?


    --- WWIV 5.5.1.3261
    * Origin: Inland Utopia BBS * iutopia.duckdns.org:2023 (1:218/109)
  • From Nick Andre@1:229/426 to Matt Munson on Thu Nov 25 15:22:40 2021
    On 25 Nov 21 11:05:29, Matt Munson said the following to All:

    Would reducing the backbone.na and merging some of the echoes into 1 might one idea to simplify fidonet?

    Nope, because many systems do not believe in "backbone.na" being some sort of central repository/authority of echoes.

    Nick

    --- Renegade vY2Ka2
    * Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (1:229/426)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/700 to Ward Dossche on Fri Nov 26 09:39:00 2021
    Ward Dossche wrote to Matt Munson <=-

    With 99.99+% of all connects now via IP, everybody can now link
    anything from everywhere ....

    The problems are that we still need a common list of echo tags available to link to, and backbone.na mostly serves that purpose.

    We have moderators who don't actively promote and contribute to their echoes
    - and a handful of moderators hanging on to many dead echoes.

    The role of moderatorship has changed, as a feed cut is no longer an
    effective deterrent.

    We have a list of echoes sorely in need of consolidation - I'd rather have a small handful of echoes with traffic than the current situation where I need to tell new sysops to go to the STATS echo to see which echoes are still alive.




    ... Is the style right?
    --- MultiMail/DOS v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)
  • From Nick Andre@1:229/426 to Kurt Weiske on Sun Nov 28 12:50:37 2021
    On 26 Nov 21 09:39:00, Kurt Weiske said the following to Ward Dossche:

    The problems are that we still need a common list of echo tags available to link to, and backbone.na mostly serves that purpose.

    But... anyone can start an echo and word-of-mouth gets it picked up almost instantly. Sometimes I don't need to announce it. Z1daily? Wilfred Van Wonderful and the rest of the suspender-ilk picked it up within minutes.

    And why does it need to have an ".na" extension...

    We have moderators who don't actively promote and contribute to their echoe - and a handful of moderators hanging on to many dead echoes.

    Its very difficult to moderate an echo when so many systems are peering/meshing with each other now.

    I agree on one thing, we don't need several Sysop or Linux echoes, in fact we could just have one big "chat" echo like Fsxnet does and likely have some good fun going on.

    Nick

    --- Renegade vY2Ka2
    * Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (1:229/426)
  • From Benny Pedersen@2:230/0 to Ward Dossche on Mon Dec 6 21:20:40 2021
    Hello Ward!

    26 Nov 2021 00:48, Ward Dossche wrote to Matt Munson:

    Would reducing the backbone.na and merging some of the echoes into 1
    might be one idea to simplify fidonet?

    Backboning is a thing from the past. Except for a tiny handful of
    systems in North America and one in Europe, nobody really gives a
    shite.

    With 99.99+% of all connects now via IP, everybody can now link
    anything from everywhere ....

    Germany is not a exeption ?


    Regards Benny

    ... too late to die young :)

    --- Msged/LNX 6.1.2 (Linux/5.15.6-gentoo-dist (x86_64))
    * Origin: gopher://fido.junc.eu/ (2:230/0)