Hello Wilfred,
On Thursday November 04 2021 10:50, you wrote to me:
@DATE: 01 Jan 70 00:00:00
MvdV>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
On some of his test messages the date in my JAM message base was
set
to: "2070-01-01 00:00:00". So they didn't end up in my BAD
area...
MvdV>> Odd. I did not see dates im 2070.
Coming to think of it, Fidonet did not exist in 1970, so 1970 on a idonet message is defintely wrong. It does make sense to interprate two digit years < 84 as 20xx. But then dates in the future do not make sense either for Fidonet messages. Perhaps Fmail should treat messages with dates in the future as BAD too. With a bit of leeway for time zone differences and klock abreations. Let's say 48 hours in the future.
Then again 1 jan 1970 00:00:00 is the Unix date set to zero, so that is an error different from "too old" or "in the future".
Maybe it's a difference between the linux 64 bit version and the
windows 32 version you are using? But I will have to "study" the
source code for this...
I can't rule it out...
How is your FMail configured regarding this? Mine: "Old message
(days) 62"
MvdV>> Set to 30 days here.
I don't think that can explain the difference in behaviour we see...
I agree, that is unlikely.
Cheers, Michiel
--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
* Origin: ZC1 certified techno-dick (2:280/5555)