Our favorite troll here actually ran the moderator of DEBATE out of his
own echo some years back
Semantics are interesting. *His* echo? IMO, the echo is a product of
the contributions by the people involved in the echo, and that's where
I have a problem with Fido moderation.
A moderator doesn't own an echo, he or she is a representative of the collective tasked with keeping the collective aligned with the topic.
If they can't do that, they don't have the backing of the collective
and it's time for someone else to take on the role.
What nasty things? I only asked you why you are using a false name
(Joacim and not your real name Joakim) and why your phone number at
What bullshit is this? Don't you have anything to do with your miserable life than jump on people? You have done nothing but attack, attack, attack. You seem to think you OWN this network, well buddy you don't.
Your days of dictating to people what is going to happen and when are over.
You can post whatever bullshit you want, whenever you want, but the rest of
us are moving forward and doing so at lightning speed. You are contributing
zero and in this case are chasing away the very people who want to try and breath new life into this decaying network.
I don't care who you are, what you did or how often you did it. So you can
throw your moderator badge around until the cows come home. Only a dictator needs to throw around his imaginary powers to begin with.
You are just sad, pathetic and just so far out of touch with reality it isn't funny.
After the moderator of this echo sent me a very nasty netmail accusing me of
various things,
I have decided to give up this echo.
I am leaving it effective immediatly and will remove the feed from my BBS later today, CET.
To you who supported me and fidonet.io: thank you. I mean it.
To you who didn't, I have nothing to say.
Good luck.
After the moderator of this echo sent me a very nasty netmail accusing
me of various things,
What nasty things?
I only asked you why you are using a false name (Joacim and not your real name Joakim) and why your phone number at 2:201/120 is the number to a company exchange (as can be seen from the double zero at the end) where there is no modem answering. That's part of my job as your RC when your NC may have missed it.
Sorry if I offended you, but at least I didn't "moderate" you in the way that e.g. common mark seems to expect, openly in the echo. Until now, that is...
What nasty things? I only asked you why you are using a false name
(Joacim and not your real name Joakim) and why your phone number at
What bullshit is this? Don't you have anything to do with yourmiserable life
than jump on people? You have done nothing but attack, attack, attack.You
seem to think you OWN this network, well buddy you don't.
Actually, he does. This echo, anyway.
That's the problem I have with anybody being able to connect with Fidonet from anyplace, it's nearly impossible for a moderator to control his or her echo because feed-cuts just won't work any more
After the moderator of this echo sent me a very nasty netmail accusing
me of various things, I have decided to give up this echo. I am leaving
it effective immediatly and will remove the feed from my BBS later
today, CET.
To you who supported me and fidonet.io: thank you. I mean it.
To you who didn't, I have nothing to say.
After the moderator of this echo sent me a very nasty netmail accusing me of
various things, I have decided to give up this echo. I am leaving it
effective immediatly and will remove the feed from my BBS later today, CET.
Great. So we lose another guy who is eager to participate and move things forward because some asshole thinks he is the supreme lord ruler.
Each of us is only supreme lord ruler of our own system.
After the moderator of this echo sent me a very nasty netmail accusing
me of various things,
| Sysop: | altere |
|---|---|
| Location: | Houston, TX |
| Users: | 60 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 25:14:08 |
| Calls: | 516 |
| Files: | 7,033 |
| Messages: | 288,251 |