• women in charge in NZ

    From George Pope@1:153/757 to All on Thu Mar 17 12:52:30 2022
    Conspiracy afoot? No idea. . .

    I'm working in Australias & New Zealand, contacting health authority executives.

    I noticed, in NZ, that EVERY top government executive is a woman.

    Where are the men?

    I know NZ was proud to start off having a female Prime Minister (elected executive leader of the nation) but is the goal to be all & only women being in charge?

    Not a word of this in the media, nor in the NBZ echoes in a couple non-internet nets (Fido & fxnet)

    How does this get done so silently?

    Is Prime Minister of Canada Trudeu's goal the same, by making 50% of eveery cabinet be female, regardless of abilities, experience or even interest, perhaps?

    Thoughts?

    Who's doing this & why?

    What kind of pushback might there be there & globally to the elimination of men qualifying for quota'ed senior positions?

    --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-6
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)
  • From Björn Felten@2:203/2 to George Pope on Fri Mar 18 00:57:13 2022
    Thoughts?

    Yeah, well, ever since I got married I have insisted that with women in charge, there would never be any wars. They would never let their kids go sacrifice themselves just to settle an argument with another country's leader, in the name of patriotism.

    Let all the testosterone stuffed male make it out on the street, and leave the rest of us alone in peace. That's what I imagine that the motto of any country, were women rules, would be.

    At the age of 74, it's still a wet dream that I'll live to see such a world. But I'll not hold my breath...


    ..

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
    * Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)
  • From Lee Lofaso@2:203/2 to Björn Felten on Sun Mar 20 20:45:46 2022
    Hello Bj”rn,

    Thoughts?

    Yeah, well, ever since I got married I have insisted that with women in charge, there would never be any wars. They would never let their kids go sacrifice themselves just to settle an argument with another country's leader, in the name of patriotism.

    Maggie Thatcher busted that myth long ago with her war in the
    Falkland Islands. Actually sank a battleship that should have been
    mothballed decades before, sending hundreds of Argentine men to
    their deaths.

    Let all the testosterone stuffed male make it out on the street, and leave the rest of us alone in peace. That's what I imagine that the motto of any country, were women rules, would be.

    God only knows what the world would look like today had Donald Trump
    not saved us from Hillary Clinton.

    At the age of 74, it's still a wet dream that I'll live to see such a world.
    But I'll not hold my breath...

    Kamala Harris might make your wet dream come true ...

    --Lee

    --
    It Ain't Payday If It Ain't Nuts In Your Mouth

    --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
    * Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)
  • From George Pope@1:153/757 to Bj÷rn Felten on Tue May 10 09:28:16 2022
    Thoughts?
    Yeah, well, ever since I got married I have insisted that with women in charge, there would never be any wars. They would never let their kids go
    sacrifice themselves just to settle an argument with another country's leader,
    in the name of patriotism.
    Let all the testosterone stuffed male make it out on the street, and leave the rest of us alone in peace. That's what I imagine that the motto of any country, were women rules, would be.
    At the age of 74, it's still a wet dream that I'll live to see such a world. But I'll not hold my breath...

    Except female leadership has always led to new wars of aggression, without fai, in known history. The most recent I can think of is Margaret Thatcher.

    I know some say she wasn't really her own leader. but a shill for the rightwing lords of industry. But either way, she joined the ranks of Cleopatra & Rome, Indira Gandhi and Pakistan, Golda Meir and the Yom Kippur war, or Margaret Thatcher and the Falklands. Also, what's-her-name in Russia of eld.

    I think war isn't only a testosterone-led thing, but a human weakness, or a fact of nature, when population needs to be adjusted.

    Human are humans, regardless of their roles: avocation or vocation; Genitalia not too relevant.

    We're inherently selfish & greedy -- this leads to war, nearly every time.

    Maybe you & I need to divide up the world into two teams & just have global peace forever, but someone'll knock us both off & bring us back to status quo in no time.

    Peaceniks in positions of presumed power get assassinated. . .

    The fact is that modern war, anyway, is very profitable for some very old & very powerful families. They don't just let that go away, especially given they feel they have absolute(nearly Divine) right over the lives of human cattle(as we are to them -- workhorses only, to ensure they maintain a certain standard of living far above what we're allowed to ever gain)

    Apparently the current goal is to drop world population to around 500M, just enough to provide for ourselves in near subsistence levels that we're to feel grateful for, & to provide for their far higher lifestyle standards.. .

    --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-6
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)