• Strangers using the White House internet connection

    From Mike Powell@1:2320/107 to All on Fri Nov 6 10:19:20 2026
    ["Someone regularly on the White House network late into the evening..." Hmmm... ]

    A device in the White House is apparently using an unsafe proxy which attackers could use it 'to reach internal systems'

    Date:
    Thu, 05 Nov 2026 17:10:00 +0000

    Description:
    "Someone in the White House probably installed a sketchy free app on their phone" - and now strangers are browsing the internet through the building's connection.

    FULL STORY
    Security experts warn proxy services on sensitive networks could
    enable abuse, anonymity, and potential lateral movement -- The IT network
    at the White House was seen routing traffic for at least 28 residential proxy services, meaning there is a strong chance government infrastructure is being abused by (malicious) third parties, cybersecurity experts are warning.

    Security researchers at Layer3 Intel published a new report , saying they saw 236 instances of residential proxy traffic originating from AS2650. That is the name of an autonomous system registered to the Executive Office of the President, the federal agency that hosts the White House network. The researchers observed the traffic between October 5 and November 3 2026, and said that in 26 of the 30 days of observation, six IP addresses kept appearing.

    "This is public access," the researchers said. "Anybody can obtain it by signing up to a public residential proxy service, paying a few dollars and sending requests through it."

    Residential proxy is a service with a self-explanatory name: paying customers can route their internet traffic through devices connected to residential internet connections (households, essentially), making it appear as though their requests originate from those connections rather than their own. They are not malicious per se, and have legitimate uses, but theyve become popular among cybercriminals looking to hide their identities, evade security controls, and distribute malicious traffic.

    Now, according to Layer 3 intel, 28 different residential proxy providers
    were able to route traffic through the White House network. The researchers cross-checked the IP addresses against public databases maintained by residential proxy detection companies Spur and Synthient, and both identified them as proxy exits.

    Apparently, the researchers did not set out to analyze the White Houses network. Instead, they said they were testing a newly launched platform that gives researchers a global view of residential proxy and anonymized internet activity, and stumbled upon the activity while requesting rotating access through residential proxy services.

    The cybersecurity community did not seem all too surprised with the news. In
    a Reddit discussion , IT experts shared their experience with senior leadership, both in public and private sector organizations, saying many were happily sacrificing security for convenience, opting not to install 2FA, or leaving their devices and email inboxes wide open.

    One reader suspected someone in the White House probably installed a sketchy free app on their phone, and now strangers are browsing the internet through the building's connection.

    The timing of the activity is also worth a mention. Around half of the observed connections happened between 5pm and midnight, Eastern time, with almost no activity recorded during the early morning. Layer3 Intel surmised that a device was regularly connecting to the White House network during evening hours, potentially one compromised by a residential proxy SDK.

    That pattern suggests a person rather than a public guest Wi-Fi network: someone regularly on the White House network late into the evening, whose device is infected with a proxy SDK, the researchers explained.

    The researchers also pointed out that poorly secured proxy SDKs can allow internal network access and lateral movement. This is how past botnets have spread, they said. If an SDK on this network has the same kind of flaw,
    anyone buying proxy access could use it to reach internal systems.

    There are plenty of other unanswered questions, too. For example, the researchers acknowledged that the data only shows network exits, not specific devices. Therefore, they dont know if the activity is coming from a personal device, a guest network, or an entirely different source.

    The White House discovery was not the only unusual thing Layer3 Intel laid
    out in its report. They also reported seeing residential proxy activity in some of the most remote players on the planet: Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, a remote South Atlantic territory. The researchers saw 413 IP addresses and more than 32,000 observations on these locations, involving Elon Musks Starlink internet, as well as local internet service provider Sure Saint Helena.

    The researchers also detected activity related to residential proxy networks in Antarctica, the Falkland Islands, the Chagos Islands, Tokelau, South Georgia, Pitcairn and Svalbard.

    Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/pro/security/a-device-in-the-white-house-is-apparent ly-using-an-unsafe-proxy-which-attackers-could-use-it-to-reach-internal-system s

    $$
    --- MultiMail/DOS
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * KY, USA (1:2320/107)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/700 to Mike Powell on Sat Nov 7 08:02:54 2026
    Mike Powell wrote to All <=-

    "Someone in the White House probably installed a sketchy free app on
    their phone" - and now strangers are browsing the internet through the building's connection.

    As a company bidding for government contracts, we have more digital
    controls than the white house?


    ... Omens are there to be broken.
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/107 to Kurt Weiske on Sun Nov 8 15:54:04 2026
    Mike Powell wrote to All <=-

    "Someone in the White House probably installed a sketchy
    free app on their phone" - and now strangers are browsing
    the internet through the building's connection.

    As a company bidding for government contracts, we have more
    digital controls than the white house?

    I can almost guarantee you do. Until recently, I worked in state government. A few of us had access to federal tax data, either for use as part of our jobs or to load/process it for those that needed it. Based on several federal-level FTI and PII data leaks that happened over those years, I can 100% assure you that the states were required to have a lot more control over the data than the IRS did.

    The one time I can remember a state (not mine!) having a leak, they got in a lot more trouble than the IRS did. Whenever it was something the IRS or another federal agency did, the reaction was usually "ooops, sorry" and that was it. Bear in mind that, due to the way e-filing is handled, their leaks often included both federal and state data but there was not a whole lot we could do about it.

    Back to the article, I liked how it made it sound likely that it was someone who lived there, or who would be there working late hours with someone who lived there, but didn't actually come out and say who. :D

    Mike

    --- ScorpioWeb v0.39a (Linux/x86_64)
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * KY, USA (1:2320/107)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/700 to Mike Powell on Sun Nov 8 09:20:25 2026
    Mike Powell wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-

    Back to the article, I liked how it made it sound likely that it was someone who lived there, or who would be there working late hours with someone who lived there, but didn't actually come out and say who. :D

    Did they ever instal Starlink at the white house, like they planned
    (threatened) to do?



    ... "Unlocking Paradigms, one blockchain at a time..."
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/107 to Kurt Weiske on Mon Nov 9 15:00:18 2026
    Mike Powell wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-

    Back to the article, I liked how it made it sound likely
    that it was someone who lived there, or who would be there
    working late hours with someone who lived there, but
    didn't actually come out and say who. :D

    Did they ever instal Starlink at the white house, like they
    planned (threatened) to do?

    I was not sure so I asked DuckDuckGo. Search Assistant returned the following:

    Yes, Starlink is installed at the White House, with taxpayers funding nearly $1.2 million for its installation and service since 2025. The service itself has been described as a donation from Elon Musk's company, SpaceX.

    Starlink Installation at the White House

    Yes, Starlink is installed at the White House.
    Funding Details

    Total Cost: Nearly $1.2 million
    Funding Source: Taxpayer dollars
    Timeframe: Funding has been allocated since 2025 for installation and service.

    Service Description

    Provider: SpaceX, founded by Elon Musk
    Nature of Service: While the service itself is described as a donation, the installation and maintenance costs are covered by public funds.

    This arrangement has raised questions regarding the financial relationship between the government and SpaceX, particularly concerning ethics and transparency.

    ===cut===

    It also returned several news article links that seemed to support Search Assistant's answer.

    Mike

    --- ScorpioWeb v0.39a (Linux/x86_64)
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * KY, USA (1:2320/107)