• Re: Prediction

    From TIM RICHARDSON@1:123/140 to AARON THOMAS on Sat Feb 22 15:37:00 2020
    On 02-08-20, AARON THOMAS said to TIM RICHARDSON:

    And when she tore up that copy of Trump's speech she demonstrated her childish hatred! A little girl in a temper tantrum.

    It was ridiculous. I used to think there were democrats who had integrity, AT>so that part of me wonders how they feel being represented by her, but AT>that part of me is gone - none of them have any integrity; not in the AT>house, senate, not state-level democrats, not even city-level democrats. AT>They are literally the party of corruption. So Nancy has no integrity to AT>uphold. The only way I can justify anything any of them do, is by AT>comparing them to other Democrats who are worse.



    If a single democrat in the house had an ounce of decency, she'd have been ousted as Speaker within days of that display of petty hate.



    Trump having the Vindman brothers marched out of the White House sent her into another one of her snits. Topped only by her reaction to Trump's new acting intelligence chief. Whom he directed to `clean house'!






    ---
    *Durango b301 #PE*
    * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)
  • From TIM RICHARDSON@1:123/140 to AARON THOMAS on Sat Feb 22 15:41:00 2020
    On 02-08-20, AARON THOMAS said to TIM RICHARDSON:


    They should have given them witnesses in spades!


    Even if they did call witnesses, the Democrats wouldn't give up. They AT>would just find something else to cry about.


    They will never give up - and will never give in. House reps are like AT>employees who we hired to innovate, but instead, they just clean the floor AT>all day.


    It is becoming more and more clear that Donald Trump was the upset of the 2016 election.....and is probably going to get a second term.





    ---
    *Durango b301 #PE*
    * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)
  • From TIM RICHARDSON@1:123/140 to GREGORY DEYSS on Sat Feb 22 18:11:00 2020
    On 02-08-20, GREGORY DEYSS said to TIM RICHARDSON:

    The republicans made several important mistakes during the impeachment trial in the senate.


    One big mistake I think they made was the witness thing. They should have given the democrats witnesses full bore! And for every witness the democrats called the republicans should have called two! And every day
    the trial in the senate went on the tape of Joe Biden bragging about getting the Ukraine prosecutor fired by threatening to withhold a
    billion dollars, should have been played at least twice every time one
    of the presidents defense attorneys came to the podium.



    The DEMS had their opportunity when they had control within the house. GD>Dale can spout off names all he wants, the facts are unchanged however GD>because these people were never called to testify or nor were they blocked GD>as he wants to pretend.


    They held the so-called `whistleblower' like a hole-card, but it lost it's value when it came out the whistleblower was more closely connected to Schiff and his aides than anything Trump did.


    Not allowing republicans the same subpoena power the democrats had, and shutting off any mention of the whistleblower's name, or even any allusion to him (especially when John roberts did so in the Senate trial) pretty much put an end to impeachment.


    Point of Order was called so much that if anyone of us, wanted to GD>entertain law school, we would of covered the chapter on what not do as a GD>lawyer. .


    It makes you wonder what law school is really like when you stop and think
    many of those democrats have law degrees!



    ---
    *Durango b301 #PE*
    * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)
  • From Dale Shipp@1:261/1466 to Tim Richardson on Sun Feb 23 00:54:02 2020
    On 02-22-20 15:37, Tim Richardson <=-
    spoke to Aaron Thomas about Re: Prediction <=-

    Trump having the Vindman brothers marched out of the White House sent
    her into another one of her snits. Topped only by her reaction to
    Trump's new acting intelligence chief. Whom he directed to `clean
    house'!

    There was no reason other than petty vidictiveness to do what he did to
    the Vindman brothers. The new acting intelligence chief has no back
    ground in intelligence. His only qualification is bowing down to Trump
    and praising him on twitter.

    Dale Shipp
    fido_261_1466 (at) verizon (dot) net
    (1:261/1466)


    ... Shipwrecked on Hesperus in Columbia, Maryland. 00:55:54, 23 Feb 2020
    ___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30

    --- Maximus/NT 3.01
    * Origin: Owl's Anchor (1:261/1466)
  • From Dale Shipp@1:261/1466 to Tim Richardson on Sun Feb 23 00:56:04 2020
    On 02-22-20 18:11, Tim Richardson <=-
    spoke to Gregory Deyss about Re: Prediction <=-

    Not allowing republicans the same subpoena power the democrats had,
    and shutting off any mention of the whistleblower's name, or even any allusion to him (especially when John roberts did so in the Senate
    trial) pretty much put an end to impeachment.

    Shutting off mention of the whistleblower's name was because his/her
    anonimity was protected under law. Outing would have been a violation
    of that law.

    Dale Shipp
    fido_261_1466 (at) verizon (dot) net
    (1:261/1466)


    ... Shipwrecked on Hesperus in Columbia, Maryland. 00:58:39, 23 Feb 2020
    ___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30

    --- Maximus/NT 3.01
    * Origin: Owl's Anchor (1:261/1466)
  • From Lee Lofaso@2:221/360 to TIM RICHARDSON on Sun Feb 23 14:31:32 2020
    Hello Tim,

    They should have given them witnesses in spades!


    Even if they did call witnesses, the Democrats wouldn't give up. They AT>would just find something else to cry about.


    They will never give up - and will never give in. House reps are like AT>employees who we hired to innovate, but instead, they just clean the
    floor
    all day.


    It is becoming more and more clear that Donald Trump was the upset of the
    2016 election.....and is probably going to get a second term.

    Well, he might be able to beat Tulsi Gabbard. But to date,
    she has yet to win a single delegate for the Democratic nomination.
    Which means your dear boy will be shit out of luck this coming
    November ...

    --Lee

    --
    Erections, That's Our Game

    --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
    * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From TIM RICHARDSON@1:123/140 to DALE SHIPP on Fri Feb 28 18:03:00 2020
    On 02-23-20, DALE SHIPP said to TIM RICHARDSON:

    On 02-22-20 15:37, Tim Richardson <=-
    spoke to Aaron Thomas about Re: Prediction <=-

    Trump having the Vindman brothers marched out of the White House sent
    her into another one of her snits. Topped only by her reaction to
    Trump's new acting intelligence chief. Whom he directed to `clean
    house'!


    There was no reason other than petty vidictiveness to do what he did to DS>the Vindman brothers. The new acting intelligence chief has no back DS>ground in intelligence. His only qualification is bowing down to Trump DS>and praising him on twitter.


    The Vindman brothers were part of a cabal who were so anti-Trump their vindictiveness wasn't even well-hidden.


    I watched Vindman testifying and his anti-Trtump bias was in plain view.


    Those `in' the administration and `in' the White House serve at the pleasure
    of the sitting president.


    Neither of the Vindman brothers were team players. They were so anti-Trump it stank.


    Good riddance to both.


    "Only libtard discussions are allowed here." .....Janis Kracht







    ---
    *Durango b301 #PE*
    * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)
  • From TIM RICHARDSON@1:123/140 to DALE SHIPP on Fri Feb 28 18:12:00 2020
    On 02-23-20, DALE SHIPP said to TIM RICHARDSON:

    On 02-22-20 18:11, Tim Richardson <=-
    spoke to Gregory Deyss about Re: Prediction <=-

    Not allowing republicans the same subpoena power the democrats had,
    and shutting off any mention of the whistleblower's name, or even any allusion to him (especially when John roberts did so in the Senate
    trial) pretty much put an end to impeachment.

    Shutting off mention of the whistleblower's name was because his/her DS>anonimity was protected under law. Outing would have been a violation
    of that law.


    NO SUCH THING!


    Whistleblowers are protected from `retaliation' (like firing, or non-promotion and such).


    The only one Adam Schitt was protecting was himself!


    Had the facts on the contact between Adam Schitt; his staff; and the `whistleblower' come out in hearings there would have been NO impeachment.




    "Only libtard discussions are allowed here." ....Janis Kracht



    ---
    *Durango b301 #PE*
    * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)